I don't think WW takes place 100 of year after OOT and neither TP takes place 100 years after OOT. But I do agree that they are on separate timelines.
Because in TP, Renado says something like:
''They are LEGENDS tell of an ancient hero in Hyrule, and your deeds brings them all to mind.''
If it's a ''legend'', than OOT cannot have happened 100 years before. Plus, when Impaz speaks to you, she says she is the descendant of Impa. And Impaz is like... over than 80 years old? So, she coudn't talk of Impa like she was her descendant. And on top of that, around the Master Sword :mastersword:, you see that the place got surrounded by a gigantic forest and trees destroying the whole place. That couldn't have happened in just a 100 years.
And for WW, when you look at the evolution of the Ritos
and the Koroks
, you see that the evolution just couldn't have happened in 100 years. The Zoras
and Kokiris
would never had time to evolve into Ritos or Koroks. And again, the legend couldn't be a legend if it just happened 100 years ago...
That's understandable Zarom, but like I mentioned before in my last post, a lot of things can happen in 100 years. Although it doesn't look like it, many things can happen during that short period of time.
For TP (getting slightly off the topic of the thread) the same thing applies. What Renado says is possibly true if you consider the fact that after OoT occurred, Link could have done other heroic things other than preventing Ganondorf from taking over Hyrule. (I'm saying that because TP takes place on the CT.) There could have also been another "Link" to appear during that time period. Hence the possible reason why Renado said "Legends" instead of it's singular form.
As for the topic of Impaz, if you think about it, being a descendant doesn't necessarily mean that you
have to be generations apart. You can be two or even one generation apart to qualify as a desecendant of someone. (ie: You are a descendant of your parents and/or grandparents.)
As for the Temple of Time, yes it's possible that the way that it looks the way it does in TP could have occured during those 100 years between those two games. For one thing, you can see that the placement of the ToT in TP is nowhere near where it was in OoT. Something could have happened to the ToT that caused it to look that way and it could have been the reason why Hyrule Castle's location was moved from where it was previously. (This is all speculation though; I'm not stating that it's a fact.) Also trees can grow really tall during 100 years. Some trees can take up to 30 years or more to mature and there's a lot of years during that time period that can allow that to take place.
As for WW, the Zora and Kokiri could have evolved over that period of time. Evolution is simply a species changing over a period of time to adapt to an environment. It can happen in a few years to even longer than that, depending on the change. Simply put, it is possible that the Zora and Kokiri could have evolved into the Rito and the Koroks during that 100-year time span.
And lastly yes, something could be considered a legend if it only happened 100 years ago. Like I said in my last post, it all depends on the generation that saw it happen. As time goes by and that generation ceases to exist, that story can be seen as just a legend by the generations that came after that one. Thus it could be possible for something that happened 100 years ago to become known as a legend.