• Welcome to ZD Forums! You must create an account and log in to see and participate in the Shoutbox chat on this main index page.

Super Smash Mafia 2: Originals vs Clones - Game Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eduarda

Srishti is annie is eduarda right?
Joined
May 28, 2010
Location
Ontario, Canada.
I might post the post I'm working on unfinished. It's getting really long and I'm getting really tired :P And I still haven't come up with a conclusion from it. Just interesting things to note. I'll work on it a bit more and then post what I have.

The day was reset, but I still have to ask why you were automatically so sure that Johnny was scum based on that? It was, at the time, completely possible that he was maybe a cop, or a doctor, or something else. It wasn't an automatic scumtell, so I think the attack was a little rash.
[...]
It's also possible the vig targeted him. Your lowest damage parameter is 50%, I can see a vig hitting 39% as one of his/her lower parameters. What you said is definitely possible as well, but I don't think it's the only possibility.
[...]
That's why I think it's possible he might've been a vig target as well.
Because at that time I thought that my parameters were 70-90%. So if I was both attacked, and a cop/doctor/vig/whatever also targeted me, there would be at least two people under that parameter. In that case, I would probably have not claimed and looked into both of them more closely. But since there was only one person within the 70-90% parameter and it's obvious that one night action with me as a target is an attack, it was adding 1+1 to me. There was no one else damaged by me so there was no second person who attacked me and one who targeted me.

I don't think Vig would have only 39% damage. But also, Jamie is most likely to be consistent and tell us when someone is attacked twice.
 

Eduarda

Srishti is annie is eduarda right?
Joined
May 28, 2010
Location
Ontario, Canada.
I don't know if this post has any use, but here ya'll go.



Right now I'm going to look into Frozen and ALIT's interaction. Though ALIT is scum, I think that their interactions are note worthy and possibly indicative of Frozen's alignment. But most of this is just speculation. Just something to keep in mind as a possibility. So I don't think this in itself should be reasons for attacking Frozen just yet.

Here is ALIT's first post mentioning something substantial on Frozen. I'm going to put the times he mentioned Johnny too, because how closely related ALIT made them. At this point of time, obviously, there's no pressure whatsoever on ALIT.
Okay, so Frozen Chosen was the first one to ask peoples’ opinions about how to plan attack strategies during the game. It’s not necessarily alignment indicative, but it’s an important post because it’s generated the most discussion of all the posts in the game thus far. At the end of the post, Frozen Chosen voices his support for wanting every player to damage a different player.
[...]
#17 makes me uncomfortable. I don’t like how Johnny is hedging his bets instead of firmly committing to a position on the issue. It’s the way start of the game, so it seems strange to see someone playing it so safe early on.
[...]
I’m not ruling out the possibility of them being scum just yet, but I feel pretty good about Frozen Chosen, Kokirion, and Doc for generating so much discussion and bringing their own viewpoints to the table, which is something scum may be afraid to do, especially if someone disagrees with them.
[...]
At this point, Frozen Chosen reverses his position on attacking, and says he’s in favor of attacking a few people during Day 1. I still feel good about his start to the game, but I can’t help but feel paranoid from his change of heart. I’m suspicious of him in the other game that’s going on right now as well, so it might be something about his playstyle that doesn’t sit well with me. I don’t want to tunnel him so early, but I’m wary of him at the back of my mind.
[...]
From this post we can say that Johnny isn't sitting too well with ALIT. That's all good and dandy. Frozen he feels good about but he's keeping a bit of a watch on him. It's important to note that ALIT doesn't put much genuine suspicion on Frozen. He mostly fills that part in with "but I'm always suspicious of him so it could just be nothing". A safe move if both of them are scum. If Frozen flips, he can point out he was suspicious of him. But while Frozen's under attack ALIT can point out that the suspicion isn't much.

Alright. You have my trust, Libk. I admit that I've been after you the past few games, regardless of alignment, so I have some peace of mind about you now. :P

Also, this is pure conjecture, but I still feel good about Doc, and I feel better about Frozen Chosen, since they were the other two people to first suggest alternate methods to attacking.
Here, ALIT expresses that he feels best about Frozen. I believe it can be safely assumed that this is out of the whole town. Now obviously an experienced Mafia player wouldn't want to say they think their scum bud is most town-like. You can take this statement both ways. The way ALIT shifts any possible focus slightly off of Frozen to counter his statement before. But also him even mentioning Frozen with such a positive light indicating Frozen may not be associated with him.

I included the first part of the quote because here, again, ALIT brings up that his past games may have caused him to have a more biased view on a few people. I feel like by him saying this, he's implying for people to take all of his suspicions with a grain of salt. It also gives him a good cushion to fall back to if someone agrees with his suspicions on a scum bud.



Now, after this part, ALIT slips up and is under suspicion. It's important to note his stance changes on players at this point.

[...]
Wait a minute. Why didnt ALIT know that Originals are the town for this game
I thought the same thing too. And people are pointing out how similar it was to Sooshi in TF2. But, in the end, I pushed for Johnny's lynch and he really was VT.

That being said, couldn't their be an "original VT" from smash?
I haven't player TF2 so sorry if I misinterpreted this post but from what I gathered, you're saying that though you noticed the slip up, it's possible that ALIT could simply have been VT and made this slip up?

Either way this whole post is really just one big blob of speculation, but if my interpretation of your post is right, you seem to be providing a pretty logical excuse as to why ALIT might have slipped. Fair enough. Others did that too. But something to keep in mind.

Guys, if the day were to end tonight, would you rather us knockout ALIT or an inactive as a policy knockout? Or no one at all?
Hmmm... I think going with slip ups and mistakes is the right way to go. I mean sure, people are bound to make mistakes. ALIT may have just made a mistake, but we probably can't let it slide unless a bigger lead is given. Inactive lynches could work but maybe we should just attack and not kill, similar to a pressure vote.

I'm not a fan of no lynches unless we are reaching lylo. But that's my opinion.

I think attacking ALIT is for the best.

Attack: A Link In Time
Now this is the big giant thing. Frozen was the first to vote for ALIT. When I first saw this I was surprised. There were still over 2 days to go for the end of the day. But I thought maybe his opinion on waiting was different.

So is he town going for a good lynch or scum washing his hands off? I didn't confirm him as townie just because he was the first to vote ALIT. I've seen in many cases in the scum QT, when a scum gets caught in their net, they encourage their fellow members to go for them. In Avengers, when Frozen was caught in a net, Viral, Frozen's scumbud, voted for him immediately without a second thought. Of course, Frozen could have taken a page off of Viral's book.

It's also note worthy that at the time of his vote, both I and Sadia expressed willingness to vote for ALIT. So it was pretty obvious that at one point there was going to be a bandwagon on ALIT. And since people again and again say the person at the beginning of a scum wagon is most likely to be town and the person at the end of a scum wagon is most likely to be Mafia, it would be a great opportunity for scum to jump first on a wagon that they can smell happening from miles away.

Also noteworthy that Frozen had not been convinced of ALIT's guilt before this, and in fact offered a reason as to why he might be innocent. And it didn't work.

Guys, if the day were to end tonight, would you rather us knockout ALIT or an inactive as a policy knockout? Or no one at all?
Hmmm... I think going with slip ups and mistakes is the right way to go. I mean sure, people are bound to make mistakes. ALIT may have just made a mistake, but we probably can't let it slide unless a bigger lead is given. Inactive lynches could work but maybe we should just attack and not kill, similar to a pressure vote.

I'm not a fan of no lynches unless we are reaching lylo. But that's my opinion.

I think attacking ALIT is for the best.

Attack: A Link In Time
I can respect that reasoning. My play in 2016 admittedly hasn't been optimal. Quite a few people thought I was scum in Love Letter Mafia when I switched my vote to Doc at the last second. Anyhow, I'm still not the biggest fan of policy lynching inactives, but after seeing what happened with Doc in Love Letter, I have my doubts about keeping that position.
I mean, the likelihood that we would hit scum by lynching inactives this game is low compared to love letter.
I don't have anything to comment on this. But it's another interaction so you guys can make your own conclusions from it.

There hasn't been much on Day 2 aside from the suspicions on me, so most of my feelings stem from Day 1. Johnny Sooshi stood out to me then as well as Frozen Chosen, but I'm more paranoid about the way they've been playing the game than genuinely suspicious. I don't like how Johnny was hedging his bets and FroCho quickly reversed his position on the attacking issue.
Honestly, I'm having a lot of cognitive dissonance about Frozen Chosen. It certainly doesn't help that I've been suspicious of him the last few games I've played. I like that he was willing to start discussion on Day 1 and present some unique viewpoints, but he's been more of a follower on Day 2. Like I said before, I like that FroCho, Doc, and kokirion presented their own viewpoints for how to attack, but Doc has seemed more consistent in his stance than Frozen Chosen.
FroCho had changed his stance much before ALIT expressed his opinion that he thinks FroCho is likely to be town. So it isn't something new that was brought up. And there had literally been only two pages of day 2. So how can ALIT conclude Frozen is playing follower this game day? This new opinion which only appeared after ALIT was pressured seems to be directly opposite from ALIT's opinion from before he was pressured. He seems to be singling out FroCho.

Now this interaction right here has me confused. For one, he's still saying "oh but my suspicions could be invalid so nevermind but this shows im totally not associated with him" but at the same time, I can see a Mafia doing this to a town, too. FroCho was the first to vote ALIT so obviously ALIT would focus on FroCho more under this new pressure.

But the sudden switch really doesn't sit well with me. This post has such a huge WIFOM associated with it, it's kinda useless to try to unravel. But we can't ignore that ALIT may be trying to put distance from him and Frozen, the same as Frozen did with his vote against ALIT. Is Frozen the Godfather?

Are you that certain that ALiT is scum to attack him(her? I don't know yall's damn genders:anger3d:) so soon? There is a lot of time left in the day.
Why not? Nothing else was getting done before that. I thought the mistake was valid to point out. Besides no one else is attacking.
Not a good reason in my opinion. There was so much more time to wait for. But I can see his reasoning so I won't push him for this. Just another thing to note in case if Frozen's scum. Attacking ALIT first would be great for him.

But this game doesn't work like that. You can't recall an attack. You have to be confident in your suspicions to attack. Are you certain ALIT is scum?
I never said the game worked like that. I never said, "I'll just take back my attack if it ALIT seems to be town." Not knowing about the term original seemed to me a valid reason to attack. Are we only supposed to attack if we are certain someone is scum? Might as well do nothing but speculate, then.
This again seems like a good defense. I think Frozen defended himself well here. But again we can't ignore it's really weird he attacked ALIT so quickly. I tried to go back to see if Frozen gave his opinion on a quick KO earlier or not, but he didn't say anything along those lines so there's nothing to compare his actions with.

It seems a lot have shifted their focus to Eduarda. The fact that she's taken a town leader type role doesn't bother me. She's done it in previous games as town. However, if she is scum, she fooled me. Eduarda was the first one to point out the ALIT slip up and I didn't notice it until her post. From there I formed my own opinions. If ALIT were to flip scum, I think we could definitely say Eduarda is town. If ALIT were to flip town, Eduarda would be a good next day target. Oh, and it's kinda hard to focus in on someone when they haven't posted in awhile... @Heroine of Time

Aside from that possibility, I don't know where suspicions on Eduarda are coming from. Maybe I'm missing something.
This is a good post. To me, it's working in Frozen's favour. If he's scum, pointing out that his scum bud's death would confirm me may not be too helpful to Mafia. He could have also shown suspicion towards me but he chose not to. I guess it's also worthy to note that he had a bit of heat on him himself at this point with two people questioning his attack. So as Mafia, he would probably have tried to do whatever seemed the most town. Gummy and him were the only ones arguing to not knock me out. Going against the flow might not have been seen as very town. But I know he's a good player as scum so I'm still taking this with a grain of salt.

RIGHT, now that i've TLDR'd JC i think the choice of target is honestly stupid yes ALIT made a Mistake but hell i didn't look at the last game of this type just so i could enjoy playing this without worrying about prior motives and the ilk. It could've been an honest mistake and i'm inclined currently CURRENTLY to believe it. (though the fact it's in green should've told you.....)
But mistakes are important to catch. While everyone makes mistakes, we can't let every single slip up go unnoticed, especially if it has to do with common town information.
How confident are you that ALIT is scum? Being the first attack makes me believe you are confident, though your reasoning is a little lacking imo. I'm just trying to understand how certain you are about him.
I'm not 100%. I don't think anybody can be unless your night actions say something. I'm just going of my own intuition and scum hunting. He didn't know about the term original. Seems like a good reason to me.

Why do you think ALIT is not scum? Also, why are you so hesitant to attack? We can't get anything done just sitting around, right? It's not like I'm going after someone randomly. I believe that ALIT could be scum because of that mistake.
This is another good post which works in Frozen's favour. He sticks to his initial reasoning. Town trying to convince everyone to vote for ALIT, or scum trying to defend his position more to get people off his case? Unsure.



Now here, ALIT is about to die. He starts giving that last big push to try to survive. This huge thing is just a mess but I'll throw the posts together and see if there's anything at all to conclude from them.

Did you find what exactly you found suspicious about Frozen Chosen?
Honestly, I'm still not feeling Johnny and Frozen Chosen. Maybe I'm being too paranoid about this, but they were my next two suspects for attack after Regal.
Attack: RegalBryant

The suspicion on Eduarda doesn't read as genuine from him, and he seems content with following the most popular bandwagon without offering much insight of his own. He says he's most suspicious of Eduarda, but then attacks me without any real reason to his position other than vaguely stating that other people convinced him.
I wanted to reiterate my own suspicions about Johnny and Frozen, and I thought it was a good post to quote because you were directly responding to one of them.
I didn't want to get into this territory. But we already pretty much know one person's alignment out of the three ALIT brought up (Johnny). He brought up Frozen, Johnny, and Bryant. I want to say that within these 3 people, one of them is scum and 2 are town. Cushioning one scum within two town would be a good idea. It might clear off that scum since they have been thrown in a group with 2 town. And out of the three, I think Johnny and Byrant were brought under the most fire. It would be good to bring up town members who are most likely to get lynched earlier than the scum so others can look back at this group and assume everyone here is town.
Again this is just a huge speculation. There's way too many variables in this whole post. It's just something I've been meaning to look into since ALIT's death. But I've put some thoughts together and hopefully you guys can make your own minds about it. I'm going to look into someone else now. But a bit later.
 

Eduarda

Srishti is annie is eduarda right?
Joined
May 28, 2010
Location
Ontario, Canada.
At this point, I'm pretty sure Eduarda is town.

You are? I'm not. Any particular reason?

Play style. She really likes to help out as much as possible when townie, and her grasping at straws yesterday was indicative of that to me. I just don't see scum taking such a gamble Day 1.
This is something I'd like the bring up. I let it slide the first time but now coupled with everything that has come up I think I should look more closely into this.

At first I was sure that the reason you thought I was town was because I called ALIT out and said all of town's role PMs have Originals on it. But you surprised me when you gave another answer.

This answer definitely isn't as solid. Me grasping at straws could have also been a scum tell. I wanted a lynch and was fine with a mislynch too. How could that rule out me being Mafia? Mafia would love a mislynch. If anything this could make me lean either way.

@Eduarda I don't think it's oh so shocking that Johnny would have chosen to target you. Anyone who's looked back on yesterday can see that you had him in a pretty tight spot.

I was going to speak more about Johnny in my mega post, but since we're already on the topic I'll express some reasons as to why he's shady:

1) AliT called him out numerous times, saying he didn't feel good about Johnny, so basically for no particular reason at all. I remember specifically that in TF2, AliT used this same tactic, calling out his scumbuds to create distance.
2) He questioned frocho's attack on AliT, asking "are you certain he's scum?", but then later said he was also leaning towards placing an attack on AliT. This is inconsistent behavior.
3) As a whole, it seemed like he was trying to sway the suspicion off of AliT, by hounding Eduarda, calling AliT town in his ISO post. When it seemed like none of that would work, he said he'd be willing to attack AliT. Shady I tell you!!!!

I'm sorry if this post is dumb I'd put quotes as proof and everything but I'm so tired rn and want to head to bed asap. Should I place an attack on Johnny (I'm asking because it's still so early in the day)? We can trust Eduarda on this one.

Also, Eduarda, are you essentially third-party?
Now this whole post. It's another thing which is really odd in hindsight. You give good reasons why Johnny might be Mafia. You're helping me push for his lynch. You're convinced he's scum. You trust me. But you don't attack.

Instead, you ask for my permission to attack. Why would I say no. I myself attacked first thing.

I remember doing this in Skyward Sword as Mafia. You were Mafia with me. I asked for town's permission before I hammered a bandwagon. You're doing the same thing here.
 

Heroine of Time

Rest in peace, Paris Caper...
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Location
Whiterun
Gender
Take a guess.
Not quite sure what to think of Johnny... I'm guessing he was just annoyed/panicked, which is why he didn't explain himself right away? Otherwise I'm confused as to why he waited a few posts to explain he was the roleblocker. Other than that, I'd say his roleblocker claim makes him seem more Town in my eyes than anything else, and his reasoning is sound to me. There's a possibility he's mafia, sure, but I'm not too focused on that at the moment.

Alright, whatever you say. My attack shouldn't put him over the edge yet, so he'll still have bit more time to defend himself (Unless he has really low defense).

Attack: A Link In Time

I hope I don't regret this...
holy ****ing scum post friendo. I was suspicious of your earlier post, but this is scummy af. Maybe if you left out that last bit, but even still, this is suspicious. That last sentence just makes that suspicion skyrocket.

Well look at that. He was scum after all. Huh.
Attack: Toxic_Snowman
I was thinking the same about Toxic Snowman in regards to the first two posts. However, I couldn't explain exactly WHY it seems so scummy to me, so I didn't say anything. XD It's like... he seems so... not only "follow the leader", but also very uncaring about the situation? Like he's just saying these things because he thinks that's what he's supposed to say. Either way, I totally agree, it felt super scummy.

Tristan said:
But for real, this is really odd. Not only is it strange to say that Eduarda is "100% town-friendly" after she hinted she was third party (this was before she said straight up iirc), but that last bit is even weirder. I didn't quote Doc's vote, but I took note of it, and it's strange that he didn't try to give Johnny any time to speak (his attack was hasty and suspicious, idk why I didn't quote it), but this post looks like you're saying he's suspicious, but refraining from actually attacking to gain town cred. Very common scum tactic. Since he was at 89%, it is possible two attacks wouldn't have finished the job (remember nobody knew his defense parameter at that time), so if you were actuallysuspicious of him, you would have actually attacked just to make sure he actually got KO'd. The fact that you didn't is extremely shady because it looks like you were trying to gain a little town cred.
Also, good points about his response to Eduarda and the sudden bandwagon on Johnny. That hadn't occurred to me. His 100% Town comment is definitely weird, considering she near-claimed 3rd party.

I'm definitely down for attacking Toxic for the day. But I want to wait to hear from Pendio before I do anything.

Now this whole post. It's another thing which is really odd in hindsight. You give good reasons why Johnny might be Mafia. You're helping me push for his lynch. You're convinced he's scum. You trust me. But you don't attack.

Instead, you ask for my permission to attack. Why would I say no. I myself attacked first thing.

I remember doing this in Skyward Sword as Mafia. You were Mafia with me. I asked for town's permission before I hammered a bandwagon. You're doing the same thing here.
Definitely agreeing with these points here, as well. I do understand Sadia's reluctance, but the way she phrased it was odd. Why ASK if you should vote? I feel like it would have made more sense to say "It's early in the day, so I'm not sure I should vote."


Eduarda, do you have any thoughts on Pendio?
 

Eduarda

Srishti is annie is eduarda right?
Joined
May 28, 2010
Location
Ontario, Canada.
Eduarda, do you have any thoughts on Pendio?
I'm definitely suspicious of him. I'm not as suspicious at his timing. Because near the end of the last day I prodded Pendio on Facebook to log on to ZD and check Mafia. Tristan and Sadia can confirm this. So the timing of his post isn't suspicious in itself. But the post itself? Yes. He said he thought ALIT was scum right when ALIT slipped up. Now I'm not sure if he logged onto ZD after ALIT's slip up, but if he did, why didn't he mention it then? I've noted it down definitely. But I've been waiting for him to respond before I look more into him.

@Pendio I'd really like to see more posts from you. You can't keep slipping under like this. Please and thank.
@Viral Maze you too. Please catch up and post something. If you can't, at least ask for a replacement. You're holding the town up.
@JC-Hurin Please post more. You haven't said much and all your posts so far just seem like you've quickly skimmed the game.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
This is something I'd like the bring up. I let it slide the first time but now coupled with everything that has come up I think I should look more closely into this.

At first I was sure that the reason you thought I was town was because I called ALIT out and said all of town's role PMs have Originals on it. But you surprised me when you gave another answer.

This answer definitely isn't as solid. Me grasping at straws could have also been a scum tell. I wanted a lynch and was fine with a mislynch too. How could that rule out me being Mafia? Mafia would love a mislynch. If anything this could make me lean either way.


Now this whole post. It's another thing which is really odd in hindsight. You give good reasons why Johnny might be Mafia. You're helping me push for his lynch. You're convinced he's scum. You trust me. But you don't attack.

Instead, you ask for my permission to attack. Why would I say no. I myself attacked first thing.

I remember doing this in Skyward Sword as Mafia. You were Mafia with me. I asked for town's permission before I hammered a bandwagon. You're doing the same thing here.

Honestly, I'm more suspicious of Sadia than Chubacabra. I found her past interactions with Eduarda suspicious; it was almost like she was playing nice. Let me go back and pull some quotes where I saw this.

@Eduarda In regard to your post about me and ALIT, all I can say is what you said. It's just speculation, and I understand that. I also found ALIT reasoning towards me shakey at best, but what made me vote for him was that mistake. Simple as that.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
At this point, I'm pretty sure Eduarda is town.

As for AliT, I'd be willing to place an attack on him when nearing deadline, but only if nobody better comes up. Simply because he might just be a forgetful person (if that's the case I feel kinda bad for him lmao). Anyway, I remember I did have a few suspicions from yesterday so I'm just going to look back on that.

I believe this is the first time Sadia seemed positive about Eduarda. Then LittleGumball asked why.

Play style. She really likes to help out as much as possible when townie, and her grasping at straws yesterday was indicative of that to me. I just don't see scum taking such a gamble Day 1.

Saying someone's play style as the main reason just seems a little too easy of an excuse. Sure, we look for inconsistent things but a good scum player still tries to keep the same style.

Before, when you said you didn't want to be interrogated you seemed nervous to me. A townie shouldn't have anything to hide, and would be confident in defending them self. But this is a good - or should I say smart - response m8.

Oh, random one here. I found this interaction with Toxic odd. I understand complementing a player, but why bring it up? Just me thinking out loud. If Toxic were to flip scum, Safia may be a part of his team.

I didn't find a whole lot looking back so I guess it mostly my gut. At the moment I'm thinking of either attacking Toxic or Sadia. I want to hear from them first.
 

Justac00lguy

BooBoo
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Gender
Shewhale
Eh, why call out all these people only to attack one? I get you want to help, but randomly attacking people who are inactive isn't going to help anything. Chances are, you're going to hit Town more than scum and you're just going to end up making people unnecessarily vulnerable.

And I'll try and be more active, but literally telling people kind of becomes annoying. You can't force people to play at a certain pace. If this was Mafia a few years ago then maybe, but inactivity is pretty common now so making things move incredibly fast promotes more inactivity because people just feel left behind.

Plus I'm not trusting your statement that "you don't want to win". I can fully relate to your situation and I was in a much more vulnerable position than you were and I still had a plan to win. If you keep attacking people because of inactivity then honestly I would rather kill you. I think your plan is to be super aggressive and force people to follow you while damaging both Town and Scum as the days go on. If I was in your situation then I would do the same.
 

ectoBiologist

Still Fandom Trash
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Location
Furthest Ring
My third suspect at the moment is Toxic. Mainly because of this:

Doc's attack would have definitely put Johnny over the limit. In my opinion there is no need to say, "golly, I would attack too if he wasn't already dead". If Jamie hadn't fixed the misunderstanding, then Johnny would have been dead anyway. There's nothing wrong with saying you believe Eduarda's claim, but to say that you would attack someone after they are for sure dead seems like you are trying to gain town credit. @Toxic_Snowman Why do you feel like you needed to add that you would attack Sooshi?

I thought the game was played to where if the person is attacked to over their defense they have a chance of dying, and that every time it goes up the chance goes up? Or did I completely misunderstand?

Given Alit's flip, this post makes me suspicious of Toxic. Others have pointed it out too. I've used wording very similar to this as scum in the past to defend scumbuds. Not concrete, but there's more to say on Toxic later.

holy ****ing scum post friendo. I was suspicious of your earlier post, but this is scummy af. Maybe if you left out that last bit, but even still, this is suspicious. That last sentence just makes that suspicion skyrocket.

Attack: Toxic_Snowman

eh, I'm not sure I buy it. I've always found it scummy to say "I know I'm suspicious, so I get why y'all are questioning me, it's ok to be suspicious because it's valid :)". Once again, something I've done several times in the past as scum, and I've seen many others do it too. It's one thing to say that you understand the suspicion, but when that's the basis for your entire defense is when it really becomes sketchy.

Keep the scum posts coming, I am enjoying reading them!

But for real, this is really odd. Not only is it strange to say that Eduarda is "100% town-friendly" after she hinted she was third party (this was before she said straight up iirc), but that last bit is even weirder. I didn't quote Doc's vote, but I took note of it, and it's strange that he didn't try to give Johnny any time to speak (his attack was hasty and suspicious, idk why I didn't quote it), but this post looks like you're saying he's suspicious, but refraining from actually attacking to gain town cred. Very common scum tactic. Since he was at 89%, it is possible two attacks wouldn't have finished the job (remember nobody knew his defense parameter at that time), so if you were actually suspicious of him, you would have actually attacked just to make sure he actually got KO'd. The fact that you didn't is extremely shady because it looks like you were trying to gain a little town cred.

I'm just gonna respond to this one statement at a time.

1. I was mostly saying that just to gain some information before making a hasty decision. I had full intentions to attack unless I disagreed with the reasoning. I wasn't really trying to protect him.

2. I'm not sure in what way this statement is scummy, I was just agreeing my Eduarda and jumping onto the bandwagon. In my big post I had saved up that was deleted for some reason, I mentioned that I asked the question to get some idea of why we were attacking, used the answer to go back and analyze things he said and did that were contradictory and scummy, and then came back with the intent to attack. It wasn't on a whim. Also, you stated how the last part was incredibly scummy, when I tried to place that in there to not seem as scummy. To you it may look like a Mafia member who was trying to act worried, but in reality I was just voicing how I hoped he was really Mafia and not Town. I can kinda see why you perceived it as a scummy thing to do, but it was genuine.

3. This statement wasn't meant to be a nonchalant response to being wrong. I understood I was wrong about ALiT initially, and I posted that on a whim to sum up my thoughts. Like I stated before, I had a big post saved up, lost it all. A lot of this was to be responded to in that, but I don't have it anymore, so this will have to do. Essentially, I get it can seen as scummy if viewed in a certain way, but why attack me without me answering your questions first? I would have seen it as a more logical and patient approach.

4. I was mostly trying to say that if suspicions are arose about me, I'm okay with being questioned, I just didn't expect it to be so sudden, and for everyone to view my posts as scummy. Sorry.

5. Well, she was trying to aid the Town, her story matched up, so I thought she was more concerned with the Town's safety than her own. Or maybe she was a third-party role who was Town-aligned. I wasn't sure, I just thought that if she would stick her neck out to help the Town, she should be trusted. Also, on attacking Johnny, I didn't want to waste my attack, so I waited until the attack tally came so I could see if he died or not, and if he didn't, then I could attack. I didn't want to use my attack if I didn't have to. I was also a bit confused on how the attacking works, as evident from my response to Frozen Chosen. I think I was off on how it worked :/

@Toxic_Snowman how many games have you played so far?
Three before this. One was the Mafia Revival, one was TF2, and one was the Lineages. In the latter two I was inactive for most of the time due to school, and such, so I didn't really contribute much. I was Mafia in both of those, though, and Town in Revival. Not sure how it's relevant, but there you go.

Hey, guys! Why not we post a little more? I think it would be fun!

Attack: Toxic_Snowman

Only scum's afraid to post
Not afraid, just busy, and also was working on constructing this post, and answering questions that I hadn't had time to before. Sorry I didn't respond immediately :/
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
I honestly didn't have a lot to say, until I noticed JC's post
Eh, why call out all these people only to attack one? I get you want to help, but randomly attacking people who are inactive isn't going to help anything. Chances are, you're going to hit Town more than scum and you're just going to end up making people unnecessarily vulnerable.

And I'll try and be more active, but literally telling people kind of becomes annoying. You can't force people to play at a certain pace. If this was Mafia a few years ago then maybe, but inactivity is pretty common now so making things move incredibly fast promotes more inactivity because people just feel left behind.

Plus I'm not trusting your statement that "you don't want to win". I can fully relate to your situation and I was in a much more vulnerable position than you were and I still had a plan to win. If you keep attacking people because of inactivity then honestly I would rather kill you. I think your plan is to be super aggressive and force people to follow you while damaging both Town and Scum as the days go on. If I was in your situation then I would do the same.
Is it just me or is he really trying to dance around the subject? Even after you called him out twice he still hasn't said his opinion on the situation, which seems quite scummy to me
 

Justac00lguy

BooBoo
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Gender
Shewhale
Btw I actually agree with Tristan's reasoning for attacking Toxic, I just don't want rash attacks because of 'inactivity'. Anyway, if you put yourself in Toxic's shoes as scum, it does ****ing seem like he's tip toeing around things which is quite a common mistake. Not sure if it could be his first time being scum or if it's just hesitation in general. Could someone point me to games he's played in the past?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom