Why are you scumleaning him again then? Is it maybe him literally doing no scumhunting? Or maybe voting Seanzie for no memorable reason and then sticking with the vote without elaborating further?
And am I missing something or are you not bringing up him pulling three different reasonings for voting me out of his ass? All of them contradicting each other?
Did you not read my post? All of those questions were answered in it pretty much. Well not the Seanzie and scumhunting ones.
He did explain his Seanzie vote more or less when it happened. Seanzie said he had 17 reads, 15 of which were the same alignment as him, Cynical asked him to give his reads and also how he can have that many in a game with less players than that, and he voted him for it. Then Seanzie posted the list with the 15 Seanzie is towns and the KJ town and Neon scum read.
Too much WIFOM and speculation
also what's up with the doubled stuff with a '/' in-between
If you're scumleaning him why do you keep white knighting him? if we both have different reasons to see him as scummy then why are we even discussing?
the interaction is legit on my end and if this is the only thing stopping you from going with my case against him then reevaluate that because as we speak I'm the leading wagon and he'll likely vote me to save his ass which means it's by a decent margin like 3 votes tyvm
Everything is speculation, there's nothing concrete to go off of right now. The / shows the 3 different worlds I can see, of you being scum, you both being scum, or him being scum.
I'm not white knighting him. I'm just explaining why your logic is faulty. I'm not going to just trust you that your interaction was sincere and then follow you for that. Especially considering since my original read on you you have provided even more logic that I don't read as genuine.
Also, you have 2 votes on you vs 3 other people having one vote. That's hardly a leading wagon, especially when KJ's was a rvs vote that he could come and take off, and other people are town reading you. Not to mention, you yourself could switch to one of the other two people and tie the votes at this moment, and that would also negate Cynical voting you to save himself since he wouldn't even have any votes on him. This is what I mean by your reactions not seeming genuine. Because they didn't add up logically and seem more to appeal to people to get them to vote a certain way.
any vote added to a wagon speeds it up regardless of the reasoning it's disguised as, so I'm not sure why you think they're exclusive?
Because you presented it as him willingly choosing to speed up your wagon because he's scum, but also voting you because it's a joke.