Search results for query: *

here but only skimmed the thread and its unlikely i'll contribute much of substance naga is probably a decent lynch because i get the feeling he won't contribute much going forward and he has claimed vanilla and there is also decent reason to believe he is scum, at least comparatively. At this...

in retrospect i guess i could have just said yes oops

i was told i now have a one-shot vig that can be used starting tonight

If you feel like It would be beneficial then ou can, although I'm not sure what Is stood to gain from that at this point.

that GY communication method is pretty clever ex. Its unlikely we got lucky and hit two scum already, and if we did we're probably in a good situation anyways, so the integrity of the graveyard can probably be trusted at this point. I don't know if we have enough time in the day left to do...

rubik is a pretty interesting vote. I can't recall any of the dead players expressing suspicion on him day 1, so its possible that whatever led them to believe he was scum was a result of night actions. The ex/kirino wagon angle is also decent, probably better than the naga case. I'll read back...

yeah basically. Its not a strong case by any means but its the strongest in my eyes. You're the only person minish expressed any degree of suspicion towards, and although i didn't read her initial vote on you as being particularly serious either, she clearly thought enough about it to stick with...

I don't know about funnier but I'm voting you because minish was killed last night and she was voting you yesterday.

you might want to think this one over

I'm probably going to work off the assumption that one of minish and poyzin was the mafia NK. Poyzin played pretty passively yesterday and so I would guess he would make more sense as the vig kill. Minish was on naga yesterday and is considered a generally strong player, so naga will be my...

so how do people generally proceed in games where alignments don't flip?

you haven't done anything thats impressed on me one way or the other, probably. What gave you the impression I felt otherwise?

when did i townread you or defend you?

You unvoted ex in response to rubik making a post. I didn't understand why you did that at the time, but its apparently because rubik was taunting you. I don't think this is at the level of 4D chess. I think that rubik was defending ex from RVS votes, while RVS voting Ex. I think you might think...

Funnier hasn't meaningfully responded to my attacks on him and that has left me feeling good about my vote on him. I'm not familiar enough with funnier's meta to know how he'd generally play but i feel like my initial attack was a pretty big stretch and he should have been able to shut it down...

if it had gone down this way i obviously wouldn't have found you suspicious. I think you know what i disliked about what you did, and the fact that you're playing it off this way feels disingenuous of you.

Exlight will probably play more honestly as town than he will as scum. If he would be tempted to say something, but decided not to because he felt it would disrupt the gameflow, then that's much more likely a scum mentality than a town mentality in my mind. I don't know enough about ex to know...

i am able to and did. I'm not surprised about it, but in combination with rubik's defending exlight in other ways the behaviour stuck out to me. I feel like rubik is the kind of player who would rather start or spur on wagons in RVS rather than disrupt them. Rubik's comments towards both...

you asked me why i voted him and spooked kirino off him

oops @funnier: what made you want to move your vote from ex to rubik? @Rubik: why were you protecting ex so hard?

also i was voting ex b/c i didn't realize funnier unvoted ex @funnier6

thats a fish btw i'm accusing funnier of fishing because his post seems like its trying to taunt ex into claiming

Unvote, Vote: Funnier <><

Vote: Exlight