Oracle Of Seasons/Ages Which One is Best?
- Thread starter Corrol132
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
I like Oracle of Seasons better. I liked changing the seasons and I liked the dungeons, and bosses in the game, and it was the first zelda I played and beat! 
(This is my opinion)
(This is my opinion)
Last edited:
OcarinaSword
Never Give up
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2011
- Location
- Home.
I'm not too sure, but ill say oracle of ages. You get to go back in time oh yea! (This is my opinion)
onebizarrekai
gay energy
I'm not sure. I like Oracle of Seasons better(mainly because it's prettier) but they're both really good.
Elvenknight
HyrulianBlackcat
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2011
- Location
- Hunting with my wolf and cheetah.
It should be 'better' not best.
I feel Ages is better, but I haven't better either yet. I might change my mind later on.
I feel Ages is better, but I haven't better either yet. I might change my mind later on.
PhantomTriforce
I am a Person of Interest
Of the two games, I think Oracle of Ages is the better game. There were many similarities between the two games, like the graphics were exactly the same, and a lot of the music was reused between the two games.
Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages focused on two separate aspects of Zelda. OoS mainly focused on tough enemies and bosses, while OoA focused on challenging puzzles. I personally like solving puzzles more than beating up hard enemies, so this counts a lot towards why I like the game more.
Fun items is another thing I like in Zelda games. Of the two, OoS probably had the better items. OoS also introduced one of my favorite items, Roc's Cape, which was not present in OoA (only Roc's Feather was present in that game).
The games also revolved around a central item. In OoS, it was the Rod of Seasons, which allowed you to change the seasons to gain access to other parts of the overworld. One of the main objectives of the game is to gain the power of all the seasons, so you can change the season to your will. OoA had a harp, which also serves as the main instrument of the game. The Harp of Ages allowed you to travel between the present and past to gain access to different parts of the overworld, or even change bad things that happened in the past so they are good in the present. Naturally, one of the main objectives of the game is to learn more songs for the harp which allows better transportation from the present to the past. The Harp concept in OoA appealed to me more, as time travelling is always an interesting concept. The time travel was improved from what we see in OoT, as we get to a point in the game when we can use this time travelling (almost) anywhere.
And probably what I look most forward to when playing a Zelda game, the dungeons. I would have to say that OoA had better dungeons. I felt that this game had better dungeon layout, and were more fun to play, and gave you a greater sense of accomplishment when completing the dungeon. OoA also had the infamous "Jabu-Jabu's Belly" dungeon, which is probably the hardest dungeon I have played in a Zelda game till today (no, I have not played AoL).
So most while there are some aspects of the games where OoS is better, I feel that OoA is the better game for the most part.
Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages focused on two separate aspects of Zelda. OoS mainly focused on tough enemies and bosses, while OoA focused on challenging puzzles. I personally like solving puzzles more than beating up hard enemies, so this counts a lot towards why I like the game more.
Fun items is another thing I like in Zelda games. Of the two, OoS probably had the better items. OoS also introduced one of my favorite items, Roc's Cape, which was not present in OoA (only Roc's Feather was present in that game).
The games also revolved around a central item. In OoS, it was the Rod of Seasons, which allowed you to change the seasons to gain access to other parts of the overworld. One of the main objectives of the game is to gain the power of all the seasons, so you can change the season to your will. OoA had a harp, which also serves as the main instrument of the game. The Harp of Ages allowed you to travel between the present and past to gain access to different parts of the overworld, or even change bad things that happened in the past so they are good in the present. Naturally, one of the main objectives of the game is to learn more songs for the harp which allows better transportation from the present to the past. The Harp concept in OoA appealed to me more, as time travelling is always an interesting concept. The time travel was improved from what we see in OoT, as we get to a point in the game when we can use this time travelling (almost) anywhere.
And probably what I look most forward to when playing a Zelda game, the dungeons. I would have to say that OoA had better dungeons. I felt that this game had better dungeon layout, and were more fun to play, and gave you a greater sense of accomplishment when completing the dungeon. OoA also had the infamous "Jabu-Jabu's Belly" dungeon, which is probably the hardest dungeon I have played in a Zelda game till today (no, I have not played AoL).
So most while there are some aspects of the games where OoS is better, I feel that OoA is the better game for the most part.
Last edited:
tecknokid900
All Hail Yhtomit!
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Location
- The Lost Woods
For me I really enjoyed Oracle Of Seasons! I must say I like Ages too, but I like Seasons better.
SuperGleeok64
For the Greater Good.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2011
- Location
- That place you can never find.
Of what I have played of OoS and OoA, I like OoA more.
Ganondorf
"Dandori Issue"
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2011
- Location
- Lake Hylia
I barely remember the games, its been so long since I played either of them, but I liked Seasons more due to the unique concept.
Ages was done better. Had a better storyline. In Seasons... oh the girl is kidnapped and a building falls down. That's it... through the whole game. It never gets more complex than that. In Ages however things change around a few times, plot twists and the like. Plus the dungeons were more engaging and more complex. Less brutal action and more puzzle solving. Plus when you start a liked game with ages, all the connections are logical and make sense. The bosses were also... in my opinon, harder to beat in Ages because they required you to actually think instead of mindlessly slash away at them. When you start with Seasons, nothing makes sense. Everyone's out of time. It's all jumbled and chaotic.
Oracle of Ages is vastly superior.
Oracle of Ages is vastly superior.