Sarcasm?
Not at all, haha. I can't remember the last time anyone took Day One seriously while I was playing.
Eduarda said:
I went back to look at the tread more closely and realized you are right. I must have somehow confused you with Moonstone. Apologies. But even with that it doesn't help your case with your follow the leader behaviour. Last game you agreed with DekuNut immediately and didn't offer an alternative method to approach the game. This game you followed me immediately. My statement against RVS could have easily been debunked by saying that votes would be transferred to attacks by the last 24 hours. This was suggested and agreed upon last game too by Moonstone I believe. Yet in both cases you followed a suggestion immediately without questioning it.
I again never agreed with him. I made a joke vote, just as the people who "voted" for me in the sign-up thread made a joke. At that point in the previous game, we hadn't discussed using votes as a way of keeping track of suspicions, and I never gave an opinion about it as a strategy.
I suppose it's my fault, but I kind of was expecting a period of joking this game as well, which is probably why I came off as sounding so "follow the leader". Saying that we'd have to have "actual analysis" on day one was just my attempt at being funny in that post.
Eduarda said:
Also your point that you were Mafia last game doesn't help your case either. Your difference of opinions doesn't mean you are town now. You should be trying to keep relatively similar play styles and opinions regardless or alignment as I'm sure you know.
Yes, I know. Fair enough. I was simply bringing that up since you seemed to be implying that because I said the opposite of something last game, I must the opposite role. That game was a long time ago, and my opinions can easily change. Especially considering I haven't REALLY played mafia in like a year... I wasn't even active in that game, haha.
Eduarda said:
Also if you were Mafia, as town now, why haven't you told us your teammates attack parameters last game? It would help the town shed light on the situation.
At the point of her post, some people were still speculating on the attack parameters. If I was Mafia last game and had any sort of information, I would have shared it. Even if things may have changed since last game. It might give town more of a solid ground to stand on and base this game's rules on. The fact that she mentioned nothing at all of last game's parameters even though she brought up the topic was really strange to me. Town being in the dark on last game would only help Mafia. There's no loss for her by stating the parameters this game if she was town. If anything, it would give her town credit.
No I doubt it. Mods usually let us use information from outside games. I mean that's kind of important when scum hunting. We need to look for inconsistencies and playstyle differences. It's a big part of Mafia. I think even in your game you said we can use information from past games but not on-going ones. And the first game was a past game.
I don't think it would be giving too much information. If anything it can help rule one possibility out as Jamie said parameters were changed. Either way I think we have mostly decided that damage doesn't indicate alignment. It was just the odd thing that I found of Heroine having the chance to share information when she didn't. As I stated as mafia hiding it would be beneficial while as town sharing it would be beneficial.
Again using past games shouldn't count as outside information. It won't be fair at all. Just things like a crumb dropped in on Skype by mistake or the Who's Online page should count as outside information.
And while that is a reason I've also stated other reasons too. Like Heroine holding back information and her statement that she would play different as town being a flimsy excuse. It's not much, I know. But you've seen me play as town in Avenger's Mafia and you know that having a lynch every day is important to me. Even if I'm not 100% convinced that person is Mafia. And right now I feel like Heroine is our best bet.
I just put all these quotes together because they're all about the same topic.
I'm very confused as to why you're singling me out for this point. I guess, now that I'm looking at it, I am the only mafia member from the last game that's in this one. However, I was not the only PLAYER in the previous game, and no one else has shared their parameters. If sharing information from the previous game is important, then you should be asking everyone to do it, whether they were Town or Mafia. Why does me being mafia in the last game and not sharing information make it me more suspicious than the person who was town in the previous game and does the same?
The truth is that sharing the old information never occurred to me. I never even thought to look at the old parameters until you said that just now. Hence why I was participating in discussing the mafia's attack parameters -- I forgot that I could even see those, lol. Do you think if I was intentionally witholding that information, I would have acknowledged the discussion in the same post that I pointed out I was mafia in the previous game?
Jamie also said that things have changed so that no one has an unfair advantage, so I don't know how useful it would be. And even then... I'd feel bad about sharing that information without permission. While I agree that posts from a different game are in no way unfair outside information, role PMs seem like they would be. We can't share role PMs from this game, so why should I be able to do it now?
But I'll ask:
@Jamie, would it be okay if I shared the abilities and parameters that the mafia from the previous game had?