• Welcome to ZD Forums! You must create an account and log in to see and participate in the Shoutbox chat on this main index page.

Game Thread MS Paint Mafia U-Pick Edition [Day 5]

Joined
May 30, 2023
One of the things that has pinged me about Numbers the most is his reaction to KJ's reaction to Amber dying. He called it out saying it sounded forced.
Gonna need you to expand on this because I didn't...? I questioned KJ about his role after ambers death but never spoke on his reaction.

making chats with dead/living is scumsided...?
Mafia networkers are pretty common. I wouldn't say it's specifically scum utility but it's definitely not town indicative utility either.
 
Joined
May 30, 2023
@ HHH:

Sure can on both parts.

First and foremost, no, I did not kill Amber. Given what happened, it is clear KJ killed Amber via his ability that allowed a day kill without ending the day.

Second,

I targeted, in order, you (HHH) on N1, Amber on N2, and Cin Min on N3 twice.
The rocks aren't adding up.
yea idfk how that would work
I was also very confused when I saw that the Thing gave me a survivor wincon because this scenario would literally never happen
It makes perfect sense. The thing mimics and blends but does whatever it takes to sustain it's life. So the thing is motivated to end the game as quickly as possible or get rid of macready. It does not want the game to come down to a three player standoff with OG though, no matter it's alignment. If mafia has it they are probably still flagged threat. If secondary town has it in that same scenario then they are essentially a threat because they'll stab OG in the face to ensure it doesn't come down to the two of them.
making chats with dead players has literally no utility for mafia
I dunno, putting words in dead people's mouths seems like decent utility, albeit minimally game impacting since everybody will take it with a grain of salt.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
To expand on that, we know that there can be a situation strictly because OG's role directly implies it.

Now tell me, why should you be taken at face value when what you say seemingly contradicts OG's role?
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2023
Gender
fae/faer
@ExLight your response seemed mostly good & like it made sense.
the only things i would disagree with is this.
Even if already had it, it's a counterintuitive play and I don't think Killjoy realized it was a possibility.
you supposedly realized it was a possibility right after you got it. killjoy probably could too.
& i wasn't trying to say that you got it from someone other than killjoy. my point was that getting it from him would have relied on pretty low random chance, wheras not getting it from him and just lying wouldn't.
the other things you said in that post make sense to me at first glance.

but, i still doubt rag would have put a role like that in the game. and my point still stands about your defense relying only on things scum and you had just done, all of which you would have known you could use to defend yourself beforehand. kj's hammer and statement, your thing claim, and the rubik 'kill'.

im going to bed so ill think about it more tomorrow.
minish's post seemed interesting but i didn't really have much time to look at it.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
I asked why you should be taken at face value. Not to explain what is apparent in OG's role.

Harken back to what JD had said about how you've failed to town tell yourself this game. That's essentially what I'm asking of you here. Your entire defense lies simply in trust and nothing else.
 

ExLight

why
Staff member
Moderator
you supposedly realized it was a possibility right after you got it. killjoy probably could too.
He could've figured it out, but I think it wouldn't be as likely.
I have over 150 games under my belt and unorthodox strategizing is one of my strong points; killjoy probably has less than a dozen games of experience and seems to be more instinct driven.
 

Morbid Minish

Spooky Scary Skeleton.
making chats with dead/living is scumsided...?

Yeah actually. It gives you chance to get info out of thread that scum could use. And you can try to make people trust you in a 1 on 1 chat easier than in thread. But I also dunno if that's really all your abilities do. The fact that you "turn" people makes it sound like there could be more. Tbh, I originally thought you might be a cult.


Gonna need you to expand on this because I didn't...? I questioned KJ about his role after ambers death but never spoke on his reaction.

Ah, I got mixed up somehow. It was Lain that said that. I've been thinking it was you this whole time. Which does change things a bit and I dunno if I would lean you as being final scum now.

it seems a bit artificial to me. immediately putting the blame on someone else, when i dont really see a reason to suspect ex in particular. and the surprised-seeming reaction. i think i might agree with @HangryHangryHippo 's idea that kj was involved in amber's death.
 

ExLight

why
Staff member
Moderator
Harken back to what JD had said about how you've failed to town tell yourself this game. That's essentially what I'm asking of you here. Your entire defense lies simply in trust and nothing else.
How have you played so many games with me and still don't remember that my philosophy for mafia is that the optimal way to win it is by trusting rather than being paranoid.

:ezlo:


Again, I have no way to prove I'm town other than asking for y'alls trust.
If the argument is that I'm scum telling the truth about the Thing, it inherently implies the existence of another scum preventing the game from ending. If my slot is leading to a time sinker dead end people can always discuss who the other one preventing the game from ending might be.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom