Game Thread Little World of Gumball Mafia: Day 4 (Endgame)

[Player 6]

guys, i have a conundrum. umu
i can't lie, i have been masking my identity. but i'm a bit scared to post like normal. though that fear was alleviated a bit by surviving night 1 because that's what i really wanted. i feel i could be more useful maybe not having to hide my posting style.

i won't lie 6, that is part of why i didn't post a lot the first day. umu

MINISH IS THAT YOU PLEASE SAVE ME

 

[Player 6]

Who am I kidding Minish couldn't post in lower case if her life depended on it

Well, lets see that normal posting style then

 

[Player 2]

what's your favorite number in 420? mine is 4.

Mine is 69

also, i would appreciate if everyone gave their #thots on if they think gumball the wise was mafia or town. thnx friendos.

Wise seemed to try to have any reason for having a real vote, ignored my question, and then gave a confusing (imo) answer. Combined with her Poisoner role, my instinct is to read her slot as scum, although I can see arguments for "any role can be either town or scum."

Looking at the kills I think it's pretty likely Creepy was killed protecting someone. I would've thought they would be replaced or mod killed but that doesn't seem to be the case from the scene and I don't see anyone killing someone who didn't even get a chance to post. Except maybe Ex. Lol. Difficult to know who they might've protected when they never posted though.

My theory is that Creepy probably protected the Innocent Child, assuming she ever looked at the thread. Moe probably prodded her for a night action. If not, it must have been a shot in the dark from a vigilante. Although, would we have a vigilante if "any role can be either town or scum," if we subscribe to that theory? I'm going to chalk it up to A Lot Of Things Could Have Happened With Role Madness and leave it at that.

 

[Player 2]

MINISH IS THAT YOU PLEASE SAVE ME

I hope it isn't Minish just so you have to solve the game yourself.

 

[Player 7]

I know I'm going to regret this but why :uhh:

it really doesn't remind me of SMS in any way

 

[Player 9]

it really doesn't remind me of SMS in any way

I would be pretty surprised if it isn't SMS too, tbh.

 

[Player 6]

That reminds me I left a message that I thought only Minish would figure out but nobody ever said anything so so so so so so so

If shes here she's probably scum and hiding from me :c

 

[Player 9]

That reminds me I left a message that I thought only Minish would figure out but nobody ever said anything so so so so so so so

If shes here she's probably scum and hiding from me :c

People trying to mask their identities probably won't point out things to give them away.

 

[Player 6]

People trying to mask their identities probably won't point out things to give them away.

She would have to ME

Unless she had something to HIDE

Because she KNOWS I wouldn't have given her away!

Blast I'm going to try to go to bed again

 

[Player 3]

Dinosaurio y rana bailando los Caminos de la Vida

aaaaaaaaapitopitwowsaaa

www.youtube.com

 

[Player 7]

She would have to ME

Unless she had something to HIDE

Because she KNOWS I wouldn't have given her away!

Blast I'm going to try to go to bed again

maybe she's angry you didn't recognize her

 

[Player 7]

My theory is that Creepy probably protected the Innocent Child, assuming she ever looked at the thread. Moe probably prodded her for a night action. If not, it must have been a shot in the dark from a vigilante. Although, would we have a vigilante if "any role can be either town or scum," if we subscribe to that theory? I'm going to chalk it up to A Lot Of Things Could Have Happened With Role Madness and leave it at that.

targetting the innocent child huh hmm
it's kinda risky for scum to do that early in the game

does anyone have any kind of investigative results?

 

[Player 10]

that's interesting
I wonder if the second kill was a sk or a vigi

1. Bringing up 3p just because n1 had 2 deaths.

wHoEvEr BrInGs ThE pOsSiBiLitY oF a SeRiAl KiLlEr iS tHe Sk

don't you ****ing get started on that

2. Meta awareness of their own actions being scummy and acknowledging it.

targetting the innocent child huh hmm
it's kinda risky for scum to do that early in the game

does anyone have any kind of investigative results?

3. Fishing for investigative claims.

-

That's 3 flags in a really short period of time.

 

[Player 7]

1. Bringing up 3p just because n1 had 2 deaths.

yea, the bodyguard and the fake poisoner certainly didn't kill themselves

2. Meta awareness of their own actions being scummy and acknowledging it.

wow it's almost like this is the fourth time someone tries to paint me as scum for pointing out that we might have a hostile indept

guess what, in all other three games I pointed this out we had a ****ing serial killer that wasn't me

3. Fishing for investigative claims.

asking for a result that can give us a solid case against someone
trying to use mechanical info for scumhunting being seem as scummy, lol

and from my experience, outting investigative roles when we have a really high chance of having more protective roles isn't as damaging, since means we can coordinate stuff better without outting ourselves

 

[Player 7]

yea, 6, I think you're right
no way 13 is Poy

after this nonsense it's prolly 10