Fair enough. I'll accept your reasoning. It's solid enough.
Ok but what about the part where you took my post out of context to make me look worse:
You took this quote out of context. I was asking Bryant to elaborate on her stance. Mostly - like as you pointed out - I found her post scummy. She didn't respond to it though, and still hasn't. Oh well. As she clearly stated that she disagreed with spreading out attacks, I asked her what her alternative strategy is instead. You took the quote and made it seem like I asked Heroine or the rest of the players during the time where I was pursuing Heroine, when I asked this question to Bryant before any of that happened.
Ok so I've been looking through Day 2 again. Specifically people's reaction to ALIT's slip up. I wanted to see if there were any relationships.
So looking at the notes I took, the first thing which stood out to me is Cthlhu, Bryant, and Johnny. All three of these players posted after ALIT's slip up. The first two posted during the time it was a hot topic, in fact. But none of them brought the slip up or stated their opinion on it (though Cthlhu did say he thinks ALIT made a mistake, but he said this much later). Instead, they expressed their suspicion on me. Johnny even said ALIT is leaning town for him in his iso. I'm not worried that they were suspicious of me. It's valid. But I'm worried that they completely ignored the topic of ALIT.
Those three were the only ones who ignored ALIT's topic (except for 'catching up will post later' players and Viral who asked ALIT a question. Not sure if that means he found the slip up suspicious or not). And they all chose to express suspicion on me instead.
Now for changes in stance. DekuNut and Doc.
@Eduarda good catch on the ALIT thing. I can support his story though, having it also slip my mind for a few moments.
For me, I'd say knock out ALIT. He actually has conversation on him and his lynch would tell us more than that of an inactive.
So knocking out someone you don't see any evidence against being scum is better than knocking out an inactive who is impossible to find evidence against regardless, because of their inactivity? I don't think ALIT has posted much on Day 1 either. He's a good player and has ISOed before as scum (I think in Dollhouse? He was about to get lynched and made a good iso post and vote analysis and I remember Viral said ALIT is his new favourite player but ALIT was still lynched and flipped scum) so if he's scum his iso wouldn't tell us anything.
As for ALiT, I am willing to chalk it up as a slip up. I admittedly forgot that my own role said original until Libk mentioned it. That said, I think we should keep an eye on her.
If I had to pick now, I would choose to attack ALiT. Sure, this could be similar to TF2 mafia, but it was still a scummy slip-up.
In your view, ALIT simply forgot. So what's so scummy about simply forgetting? You did too.
Another change but this doesn't seem as drastic. Tristan. When I first brought up ALIT's slip he was full on against him and tried to bring more arguments against ALIT in fact. Now that ALIT's suspicion has somewhat died down, he's turned his attention mostly to someone else (me). He did say that he won't let ALIT go, but his drastic change on ALIT when ALIT didn't say much to change his opinion is odd
