• Welcome to ZD Forums! You must create an account and log in to see and participate in the Shoutbox chat on this main index page.

My Timeline Like No Other.......

Well, the First Ganon was a Gerudo, they were in OoT. The Second Ganon was a Gerudo, they were in FSA. The Third Ganon depends. If he is the same as the Ganon two or one, then that explains that. If the Third Ganon is not the First Ganon or Second Ganon, then it is still possible since the Gerudo Valley is not in Hyrule. In OoT, you go there, but it is considered a second country. In TP, you go to Gerudo Messa, not Gerudo Desert, the difference is, Gerudo Messa is in Hyrule, Gerudo Desert is not. In FSA, Gerudo Desert might or might not be apart of Hyrule, I am not sure on that. I beleive, if the Third Ganon is his own Ganon, then the Third Ganon's Gerudo Desert is outside of the hyrule you see in LoZ and AoL.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Location
Liverpool, UK
except for key areas of the timeline e.g OOT split timeline TP, MC etc most of the timeline is fan fiction, thats kind of the point in theorising the timeline!
 

Pinecove

Last Chance
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Location
Toronto Ontario
except for key areas of the timeline e.g OOT split timeline TP, MC etc most of the timeline is fan fiction, thats kind of the point in theorising the timeline!

This couldn't be wrong on more accounts.

A theory should be based upon factual evidence, otherwise anyone could state whatever they wanted. Theories should accept evidence, refine it and let the evidence shape their theories. A true theory does not pick and choose evidence - the theory in question accepts all the evidential outcomes. In short, a theory isn't fan fiction at all - it's something that we strive to make to better understand something we do not know.
 
Joined
May 28, 2010
If you say that LoZ an FSA can go after ST then how do you explain that the spirit tracks are missing?, also I read somewhere (I think it was ZeldaWiki) that AoL is a direct sequel to LoZ, and that AlttP should be a prequel to LoZ (Even though Miyamoto said the opposite at first) my timeline would be something like this:

............................../--WW--PH--ST
SS--MC/FS/FSA--OoT
..............................\--MM--TP--AlttP/LA--LoZ/AoL--OoA/OoS

I believe in the separate entity theory, but I also believe that there are a lot of plotholes, because the series is incomplete I believe Nintendo will fill those plotholes but right now the timeline is incomplete
 
Joined
May 28, 2010
yeah, but in the intro of FSA (which I think tells the story of FS) it says Link is Zelda childhood friend, and also Link took the Four Sword because he knew what would happen and how to use it, but how are you so sure that it isn't the same Link?
 
Joined
May 28, 2010
You didn't answer my question, plus if you place FS in the adult timeline you create a contradiction, since FSA is a sequel to FS (you like it or not) as the intro in FSA tells the events of FS, and since according to you FS can be placed at the adult timeline
Okay, here is my timeline.
Base: ZSS - MC - (FS) - OoT
Adult: TWW - PH - ST - (FS) - (LoZ)
Child: MM - TP - FSA - ALttP - OoA/OoS - (LoZ) - AoL
you create a paradox since they occur in different dimensions
 
First of all, the two timelines are not different dimensions. If you go over quantom physics, you learn that there is a very populer theory that sayes everything that can happen, does happen in seperate realities. So I consider them more like realities. Second of all, i put the possibility of FS on a seperate timeline for a few possibilities. In both MC and FS, there is no mentions of maidens. The only reason people put FS in the intro is because Zelda was kidnapped, but she may not be a maiden. Just because Zelda in OoT was a sage, does not mean Zelda from, lets say, ST is a maiden. So I think there is a possibility that they might have been planning a fourth game that they are secretly working on that includes vaati in it that goes somewere inbetween MC and FSA. Since, for this game to work, vaati has to either never die in it and just sceal, or Vaati has to die and be revived in the occurences of the game. It is also possible that in the intro they state Vaat was killed before and then the revival and scealing happens in the game. If that were to happen, this fourth game (FG) can go either after FSA, or they are implying a fifth game were vaati is released and killed exists. Now, FS can still go were it does if Aonuma or Miyamoto actualy confirms that Zelda was a Maiden in FS. SO basicly, I have been thinking about htis for a long time and came up with one odd theory. XP Also, I put the possibility of LoZ being after ST/FS for a few reasons. LoZ was confirmed to be a direct prequal to AoL, but that was when LA came out and they never thought the series would grow so large. Since OoT came out, the timeline has changed a bunch of times, so I do not see why LoZ's place can not change. In ST, people moved from old hyrule to new hyrule. (OH, NH.) I beleive that there might have been an instant that the world unflooded a little while they moved to NH since NH's Map is reminiscent to AoL's Map. So that means OH could have been unflooded and still unihabited. So, that explains that part. As for LA, I can put it anywere since there is no non-theory facts that support were it goes. Any more questions? I will be glad to answer. ^ -^
 
Joined
May 28, 2010
oh I get it now thanks, I just have 2 more questions: Do you believe in the Deku tree's success? and if your timeline is correct where are the Spirit Tracks on LoZ and FS?, I agree that Miyamoto and Anouma can change the timeline (they already have with ALttP), I like being able to discuss with someone who is informed, but I still think that all timelines are incomplete because not all Zelda games have been released, also on you information it syas you haven't played FS or FSA, butyou do know a lot about them, how is that?
 
I watched them both on youtube. Yea, I had a lot of time on my hands..... Anywayes, I am a little iffy if FS takes place in OH or NH. I think it is in OH, so thats why the places have different names. As I said, this is after the flood. But, the thing is, if FS is after ST, then LoZ is not after ST. It is either one or the other because if either are there, they have to be in OH. I think it is more likely LoZ because they specificly said it was Old Hyrule when talking abou tthe game. But, FS can only go in the two specified areas, and despite the facts, I have doubts FS goes on the base. So, if I was sure, I would not put the possibilities by now. And what is the Deku Tree's Success? Is that in TWW were he acomplishes his forest? If it is, I do beleive he completed the forest and made the Sea of Trees rather than Forest Haven.
 
Z

zora14

Guest
That looks about right, but go on youtube and watch the 8 minute long zelda timeline theory video, it makes perfect sense.

I agree, but there's a genius on youtube who made a similar one which makes complete sense. he also adds in a theory on how Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask Link could be the father of Twilight Princess Link. Oh, and congrats on your first post. do u like the site so far?

It's quite funny how you misspelled the word Grammar, but I agree grammar is important. That statement might be true on the adult side of the timeline, but on the child side, it has to be Majora's Mask next.

Dude, just go to youtube type in zelda timeline theory. it's an 8 minute video, guaranteed it will answer all your questions about the timeline. This guy really did his homework for this video.

I dunno, but I think we can all agree that Nintendo should make an official timeline and end all of this bickering.
 

PhantomTriforce

I am a Person of Interest
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Location
Ganon's Tower
It is interesting as I like how you've put ALttP/LA is the adult timeline. It does make a lot of sense, but it has been confirmed that WW is a direct sequel to OoT. It's also a bit confusing, as when OoT first came out, is was supposed to be a prequel to ALttP, making ALttP the direct sequel. It's complicated :P.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom