also thank u for the lovely pokémon u said I remind u of
It's supposed to be beyond, yes.
I'm prone to typos.
also thank u for the lovely pokémon u said I remind u of
OOF, well, its a good thing, you know that to be true.I'd rather not reveal too much, specially considering there are some pieces that are unknown to me that could lead to misunderstandings
but I can affirm with conviction that lynching him does not damage town in the way he's fearmongering us
And you didnt respond back to it. Maybe you should take a look at some of the stuff I said.my iso on him (the post breakdown analyzing most of his posts) highlights why I'm scumleaning him at the moment
All of this stuff here, I talked about in my post about your ISO, but you havent responded to it yet. Maybe you wont.to sum it up his constant rolefishing, aggressive hounding, attempts of intimidation, contradictory behavior regarding votes and theories, attempt to fearmonger us into not lynching him, push for a doctor lynch, and potential scum slip lead me to believe he's likely mafia
You missed the point entirely and it is very well possible that my words were twisted. With the whole cop situation with how would I know, I wouldnt not without hard evidence.As an aside, this is real cute coming from someone who, within the same post and just prior to this no less, claimed hard evidence is important and likened it to a role cop that gains info on a player's role -- as if to assert that is quote unquote "hard evidence".
Like, how do you know the person claiming to be the cop is telling the truth? How do you know they're not mafia?
What proof do you have that [they] are a cop with a check on a player's role? In my mind, I am not throwing shade on a Cop. I am throwing shade on a potential Cop. I have no proof if [they] are a Cop. Do you? If not, then don't say that [they] are. You are (un)intentionally trying to paint paint your stance in a [positive] light. Why is that?
There is nothing to commit to because there is no Hard Evidence to say that [they] are lying and is Mafia acting like a Cop. You would know about Mafia acting like a Cop, wouldn't you, OG? Do I have to remind you?
Suffice it to say, the "hard evidence" is taking the person at face value until proven otherwise. If you want to be sus of them, well, you reap the consequences of such. It's just funny that you would hit Ex over the head for something you are doing yourself.
Nope, you gotta read my post where I said what Rag clarified to me.ye
by pushing a convenient narrative that we'll be heavily punished by voting him our first reaction is to back out
but it is extremely unlikely a host would develop a role that "guarantees town to lose" when lynched
My current wagon.The D1 wagon KoD started and you joined, or the current wagon?
And if this wagon disperses? I take it you'll refuse to tell us anything?
[I am NOT saying that it will or will not, but, rather that there's still a slim off chance of a possibility]
You were never notified? Ever? Either this is true or you are lying. What is up about the Miller then?If I'm the Thing, I was never notified of it.
I'm not opposed to being nightkilled after you get lynched if you flip Town and you claim only lynches trigger the creation of a new Thing.
I dont know what abilities it has. Whose The Thing gets lynched, then it randomly gets passed to someone else.and what does the "thing" do?
a role that is passed around can either be positive or negative
Please explain it then.Incorrect, OG.
You sit there and claim they are different when they are, in fact, the same.
You just want to have your cake and eat it too wrt to your perspective. That's why you fail to see the issue in your thought process.
I do love stufful!Whose answer did you vibe with most? (This is not asking to out the incenaroar info, just curious whose answers you liked the best.)
i see. that makes more sense.My vote for OG at night was a joke. But that doesn't mean I couldn't be suspicious of him already. Similarly I pointed out that my own line about OG and Jamie was irrelephant because that conversation took place during a delay in breaking day when changing targets isn't typically allowed, making Jamie being killed for that conversation implausible. It was said less in jest and more to see how OG would react though.
My initial suspicion is founded in OG's double down on KJ after his doc claim. OG replying to a night vote with four no's seemed excessive too. So I threw one during the day and got a similar heavy defense. So all of this cemented that OG wasn't town to me.
Is there anything binding you from telling us now?I havent read all the posts yet, but Rubik is The Thing. If he gets lynched then someone else will randomly be selected to be the Thing. Rubik go to my siggy and open up "Quotes". Does it makes sense now. If I get lynched I dont care, but I will provide town with all info I know. I need to continue looking on how to stop The Thing.
From the way he worded it, looks similar to the Buck from Storms "Chaos Mafia" games but with a twist.and what does the "thing" do?
a role that is passed around can either be positive or negative
I'm pretty certain that once you're lynched the only "info" we'll get is your role/alignment, nothing regarding this new "theory" you claim to have or something, something, such. So you might as well give everything.I will give all info I know because no one really believes me and the info will become useful once everyone sees my role.