#1 Gumball the Agitated
5/10. More of a gut feeling. Don’t like how they are playing:
Unvote: Player 6, Vote: 12
Bandwagoning on my meme vote with a garbage reason. What are you going to do of note during the beginning of a game?
I hope you're Ragnarokio
She asks people to vote on the slightest pretext, but rags on #12 for making a serious vote, which, if your vote was a joke vote, it wasn’t really a bandwagon; we have to transition out of RVS phase somehow.
Not huge scum vibes, just too abrasive to be the most likely townie supporter.
#2 Gumball the Queen
Not a lot to say. Has pretty similar opinions to mine it seems so I’m inclined to believe she’s town. Couldn’t find much significant either way though. 8/10.
#3 Gumball the Creepy
RIP
#4 Gumball the Wise (poisn)
How serious were we supposed to take Wise’s first vote? #8 asking player #6’s role was very in line with all there are other posts in the initial span of the game, so I feel like that vote was a little too early for it to be justified. Seems like a scum thing to start drama that early.
I'm sure they do, but you're not going to learn anything about mafia because they will lie and if you learn something good about a player its risking mafia killing them at night. So there's no point.
I’m trying to think on this post, is it more scum to insert the idea out there that it’s not worthwhile to prod people’s descriptors (ie. so they don’t have to bluff in an obvious way if there name role connection is prodded), or more townie to point out that, like their role, the connection is vague and isn’t something that is worthwhile investigating. Part of me feels the latter hold true, in that it’s not worthwhile deciphering names, but the possibility that by prodding someone they end up admitting a fake role that gets them caught is still there, which makes me feel more sold the blatant brush off is scumtell.
Why should it matter who is who? Alignment won't be related to identities.
I know this isn’t her outright saying it, but the fact that the poisoner is saying that roles don’t have anything to do with alignment, and therefore that her alignment isn’t a third party (poisoner), makes me feel more sold that there are only town and mafia (sans maybe SK or some miscellaneous role). Sorry if this was obvious and other people realized that I’m still catching up.
Overall like a 3/10? Idk maybe too generous but the possibility of there being multiple poisoner roles confuses me.
#5 Gumball the Nice (inno)
Not much to say here. Inno and inactive lel (it’s only joke ily). 10/10.
#6 Gumball the Deflective
Seems way to active to be scum, but also just someone who gets heavily invested in general. Tentative about voting so it's hard to pin them either way for bandwagons. Wants our lynch candidates but hasn't supported one herself yet. Amiable in general. Too active to be a good lynch candidate, but annoyingly tame in opinion to be so boldly to be asking for the most.
7/10
#7 Gumball the Fierce
Jumped the gun on protecting #6 when they thought role was positive. Didn’t even reply to the prior discussion of role to name importance. Appears overly defensive. More from a general feel I would say 4/10.
#8 Gumball the Ballin
No matter what the fact that she remained serious about asking for mafia claims is weird but is it really scummy? Also, I hate reading through her posts because it’s hard to take them seriously with nya at the end of each one. Too antsy is the best thing I feel I can say about her. 6/10 not a real suspect. Hard to say now since player switched though lol
#9 Gumball the High
Slight suspicions about her saying roles and names aren’t related. Not too abrupt about it though and seems technically for the most part true since the roles aren’t thinned enough and relation isn’t clear enough yet for us to make any realistic guesses, but eventually I feel we might be able to make some deductive reasoning (the question I have is how murdering roles will look when dead; aren’t some roles like innocent child just inherently town or mafia?). 6/9 not a lot to go off of.
#10 Gumball the Fashionable
Already talked about em’ a bit. Feel like we have at least some kind of lead through Wise so it could be good to follow through. Still only a chance that Wise was scum so I’d rather not just kill them off of second degree guilt just yet. 5/10.
#11 Gumball the Wolverine
Mostly townie vibes. Stood up for #8 trying to figure out roles which I think is a better take than others. 7/10.
#12 Gumball the Ecstatic
Super indeterminate about #12. None of what they said was all that weird reasoning wise honestly. Interesting interaction between #7 and #12 with how at odds they were suddenly. Feel they are for sure of opposite alignments. Current read would be 7/10 since I think fierce is more likely the scum of the two. Need to read more of their posts though.
#13 Gumball the Animaeus
Qt
#14 Gumball the Slightly Disappointed (fake poisn)
Honestly no idea 5/10.
These are my thoughts from a quicker read through (skimmed through a lot of the later pages). Not very structured or concrete just my general thoughts. I’ll respond to stuff but I probably won’t re-read thread again until late at night because I am once again dead and I need rest, but I do feel like I’m slowly getting a better understanding of player behavior.
Man is reading hard though. Read ratings are really spur of the moment so don’t take them too seriously. Need to re-read and spend some thonking time on how past behavior seems relative to each other for better rankings.
I have a weird suspicion of #7 but I don’t have any real pressure material so I wouldn’t vote her. Fashionable seems like an okay option given the evidence we have? But I’m still not all that sure about her or others enough yet to decry anyone for sure.