Inflexus, If you have to disprove evrything that Nintendo and myamoto says to make your timeline work, then your timeline is a bunch of bull. Im sorry but your really starting to aggitate me.
I'm simply saying that it is impossible to produce a clear timeline because the story depends heavily on impossibilities due to failures when the plots of games don't adhere to the chronological order that Miyamoto and Nintendo claim.
All we know as a fan base is this
OoT is first (in 1998 anyway MC could be before it)
This does not account for Twilight Princess.
MM is a direct sequal to OoT in the Child timeline
I've allready provided an arguement that is yet to be refuted, and proves that Majora's Mask is simply a game loosely affiliated with Ocarina of Time, not a chronological sequel.
WW takes place more then 100 years after OoT in adult timeline
PH is a direct sequal to WW
Once again, loosely based and even at that it doesn't match up with Ocarina of Time in the slightest, one of the hints at this is the altered number of sages(it goes from 6 in Ocarina to 2 in Wind Waker).
LoZ is the only time Gannondorf dies
Twilight Princess as well, so your assertion is refuted.
AoL is a Direct sequal of LoZ
I'd like to see where this is revealed, and where the storyline is just a game sequel or a chronological sequel.
Once again, a URL, a press release, whatever. I'd like to see the actual claim in it's original context.
LA is a direct sequal of AlttP
Where is this claim made? I need a source and the original context.
And there is a split timeline (if you belive what that one guy said, whom i forgot the name of, when they showed WW at E3.)
If you can find that, let me know. I would like to see it.
This is all fact, after that is where you can speculate where evrything goes
Speculation is not the limit. Just because we don't have all the evidence doesn't mean we can't create logical theories to explain the current state of the Zelda universe.