But neither me nor Jinjo were under trouble in Day 2 until I made her that way and even fought for it… Wolves do not think to betray the other of their kind unless they fear their own life.
They do. (though whether or not you would is another question). One common pattern that results in wolves mislynching teammates is the wolf initially starting a case on a teammate because they think they're acting scummy and want to fulfil the dual objectives of making themselves look like they're playing the game as town and make it seem like they aren't both wolves in the event that one dies. The hope in this play is that the player will not end up picking up much heat as a result of the vote, and that the player can leave their vote there without the person ever being threatened with a lynch. In the event that the person does end up picking up a lot of votes than the player needs to make the decision to jump the wagon (and perhaps end up looking bad as a result, especially if the person ends up being lynched) or to stick with the wagon and end up looking townier once the wolf flips. There are a lot of other situations where wolves can vote wolves for reason other than self-preservation but this is the most common pattern i've seen. There are some players who think that this sort of strategy is good and some players who think that its bad, and thats part of why i town-read a bunch of people, because those are players who i would think would never act this way, at least on purpose.
Here's my two cents on Rag
She asks this before players start to bandwagon on Jinjo in the last bit of the day. Out of all the players being suspected, her asking about Jinjo specifically is pretty suspicious in retrospect, especially when you count in her behavior coming up.
That was at a stage where I didn't have a solid read on either of the leading wagons and had less than an hour to develop some. I read back on why players were voting for seanzie and why they were voting for jinjo and evaluated the cases. I found that soul hadn't talked much about jinjo recently and that her original version for voting jinjo was lukewarm so i was curious to hear an updated account of why she thought jinjo was scum, both to better understand her as a player and to better inform my vote between jinjo and seanzie.
This makes sense as a townie, but if we're viewing Rag as scum, this just seems like an excuse she made to keep her scumpartner from being lynched.
if it makes sense as both alignments its typically NAI.
I told her to vote who she thinks is scum, so she does. Keep in mind Seanzie had the most votes when she said this.
Both Minish and Dawn decide to vote Jinjo between these two posts. Is this an effort to at least make a tie between the two? She said she would vote PK, but that was when Jinjo had less vote than Seanzie. Once Jinjo was in danger of a lynch, Rag immediately switches over to Seanzie.
This seems like more than just a mistake in reads Rag.
I switched onto PK because i was townreading both seanzie and jinjo at the time. I switched back onto seanzie because i was townreading jinjo more than him and it didn't look like PK was getting lynched before deadline (i think there were something like 5-10 minutes at this point).
Also, Rag had a hard time making decisions for herself. She instead took others' views and made it her own:
She didn't even have a reason for voting Ex other than just because other players said they thought it was a cool idea.
Then she immediately switches positions when faced with opposition. She says she realizes there isn't a reason, but she also didn't really have a valid reason when she did vote Ex. To me this signals she was trying to gets on the townies good side and agree with their opinions.
Any thoughts?
I was unable to evaluate the value of lynching the host as a maneuver because i'm entirely unfamiliar with the tradition. Deferring to people who know more than me about it to decide whether its a good play or not seems entirely rational as either alignment.
the other stolen one is exlight…. Definitely not worth bothering with. The stuff in that PM…..
Are you saying you saw the contents of exlight's role PM?
Also, why did you decide to target soul?
Am I misreading your list or are you town reading everyone who is a ZDI player?
I don't know what ZDI player means exactly but if you mean "someone who has played on zelda dungeon before" then i'm townreading everyone but echo and dawning winds. If ZDI refers to something else then you'll have to explain it to me, I'm not familiar with the acronym.
I scanned Rag last night with the tracking bug. Rag didn't target any living players, but they visited the cemetery. So Medium or Necromancer, I'm guessing.
Vote: Rag
I am indeed the necromancer. By the sounds of it I'd guess minish is our medium. I already soft-claimed my role in the form of the role post. I can visit dead players at night to gain zombie versions of them that have weaker versions of the abilities they had when they were alive. What I didn't claim earlier that I will now is that I can also use the zombies for other miscallaneous things, like stealing player's money or blocking kill attempts on me.
My role overlaps very heavily with minish's claimed role and appears to be significantly weaker. Each of my zombies can only be used two times total, whether for their ability or for a miscallaneous action, and i can't both raise and use zombies in the same night.
Last night I used my triple shot to revive every dead player as a zombie. Zomblaur lets me get a colour result from one player (which may be helpful in combination with minish's role if both of us are telling the truth), Zombinjo lets me poke one or two players at night, and Stormbie lets me double someone's night action. I can use all three of these abilities tonight if i so choose, and will almost certainly use at least stormbie and zomblaur. It might be interesting to double minish's action and then use zomblaur myself to get three more colour results.
@15377 For clarity's sake, you're claiming a town result on me?