DBZ MAFIA GAME- The Battle for Earth, Z Fighters Vs The Androids

[Pen]

We don't have to. What? Look at the previous vote counts. My votes for rule change and my vote on Thar was counted.

They were? I did not notice. Thank you.

Vote: musicfan

EBWODP:

Vote: musicfan

 

[fused_shadows]

Vote: shut up about the rules, make your vote for or against a change, and play mafia

 

[Musicfan]

We don't have to. What? Look at the previous vote counts. My votes for rule change and my vote on Thar was counted.

Because if we can't no lynch that means someone must die even if we have no idea who is scum, increasing the chances of Scum death.



Read above, and don't talk to me like I don't understand the game. The obnoxious all caps is very rude in my opinion. I'd appreciate if you don't talk down to me at all or I will also talk down to you, thanks.

EBWODP
I'm an idiot. I meant increasing the chance of town death***

****.

How is highlighting a single point in all cap equal rude she was trying to make a point.

 

[Musicfan]

TO PUT IT SIMPLY:
If you want to vote for a rule change, you just need to put a bolded vote.

This has no effect on your other votes and is completely separate, and it is a permanent rulechange unless voted against later in the game.

Also Pendio you forgot to bold your vote ^_^

EBWODP


"You're kidding me" < --implies I'm saying something stupid, the all caps is well known as yelling, otherwise why all caps? All caps italic underlined is basically screaming at that point.

Listen man, if I find something to be rude then that's my problem, not yours. If she can simply take precautions to not talk down to me in the future then it will stop any future confrontations.

I dont see how its talking down she is pointing out the fact that no lynchs are very good for scum something you forgot about.

 

[fused_shadows]

Ah, the Day 1 hump. Such fun.

We need someone like M107 to be annoying so we can get a quick bandwagon.

Anyone like to volunteer?

 

[fused_shadows]

asgfdghsdfhgh

Ah, thank you.

Unvote

Vote: Xyphon

 

[JuicieJ]

I vote for a ****ing rule change.

HAPPY, XYPH??????

 

[JuicieJ]

I love how satire just flies right over your head.

 

[Sydney]

It's talking down because of the language and sentence structure. Being right =/= talking down, talking down = talking down. That's what she was doing. Saying "You're kidding me" and the all caps italicized underlined implies I said something "stupid" and seems to me to be talking down, ultimately saying "look how good I am at mafia".

I've explained why no lynches can be good for town as well, it allows for us to skip out on lynching a townie. Ultimately, a no lynch is another option for the majority(which has to have town members), and restricting our options is scummy to me. When we have no leads we need not automatically jump to a lynch.

Again, if I find it rude then that's my problem, not yours. The only other person who has to give the slightest **** is Atticus, and if she doesn't care to change her attitude then she doesn't have to, all I am saying is if she doesn't change her attitude then I will change mine. I'd appreciate it if you would stop responding to my direct messages to other players like this. It's none of your business and you don't need to make it your business. Just accept that I feel talked down to and move on.

I'm sorry you feel that way, but it's your problem you feel that way, not mine. My attitude is my problem, not yours. Lets leave it at that.

---

No lynches can hurt and help the town. Lynching someone on day 1 is not a bad thing (underling because it's important). Can it hurt the Town? Yes, there's potential for that, absolutely. Is there also a possibility that we could hit scum/third party? Of course. Though the probability of lynching a Townie versus lynching a Mafiaso is high, it still doesn't make the latter impossible. Aside from that, we can't always depend on the nightscene. What if the roleblockers are accurate? What if the Cop gets a Not Guilty result? What if the Doc protects the right (or even wrong) person? There are many, many factors we need to consider before we just blindly leap at an opportunity that may or may not work in our favor. This isn't like Korra Mafia where virtually everyone was split on who to lynch on Day 1. A No-lynch was vital in order to get the ball rolling, here it's another story. We have two people who could potentially be up for a lynch: Thareous and Ventus. Do we know if they're scum or not? No, but lynching them could give us a good idea of who might be. We need to make sacrifices, because we can't play it safe all the time.

I hope you don't think I'm doubting your abilities of how well you play Mafia, because that wasn't my intention. But you can clearly see how my response was justified.

 

[fused_shadows]

We have two people who could potentially be up for a lynch: Thareous and Ventus.

While it's true they have the most votes right now iirc, I don't necessarily think that's a good reason to say one of them should be lynched. I'd rather lynch someone inactive; someone that stopped by once, made their RVS post, and then left. Why? Because in general people who show little interest are either A) trying to hide in plain sight (generally a mafia tactic) or they have a lame role, and thus lost interest in the game.

The worst case scenario in this situation is we hit a VT; not a major loss on Day 1.

 

[Johnny Sooshi]

Because if you are about to lynch the cop it'd be nice if they could say "Well I am the cop so you probably shouldn't lynch me!!"

I believe though, we can soft claim, right? So we should still be able to say "Well I investigated whomever, so.." but roleclaiming just makes it easier.

At the very least everyone should vote to allow no lynch. Anyone who doesn't want the option, idk, that seems scummy to not want an option of no lynch.

Okay, thank you. I was under the impression we were more or less voting to allow FMA to go down again, resulting in a mass roleclaim, at which point I would probably scream and throw my computer at the wall.

 

[Sydney]

While it's true they have the most votes right now iirc, I don't necessarily think that's a good reason to say one of them should be lynched. I'd rather lynch someone inactive; someone that stopped by once, made their RVS post, and then left. Why? Because in general people who show little interest are either A) trying to hide in plain sight (generally a mafia tactic) or they have a lame role, and thus lost interest in the game.

The worst case scenario in this situation is we hit a VT; not a major loss on Day 1.

It's hard to gun down inactives when it's still the first day...

 

[fused_shadows]

It's hard to gun down inactives when it's still the first day...

Alright. Let's just sit here and count the marks on the ceiling.

 

[Sydney]

Alright. Let's just sit here and count the marks on the ceiling.

I counted 69, wbu?

inb4 anything you'd typically say

 

[fused_shadows]

I counted 69, wbu?

inb4 anything you'd typically say

70.

lrn2count