Why won't you vote Ventus with us?
Come on; it'll be fun.
@Ventus you don't have to remove your vote for a player to vote for a rule change, they are separate.
Wait, why are we all asking to roleclaim? I thought the point behind mafia was a game where people don't know who each other are and have to go off of knowledge they gain by playing...
Sorry, I really don't want a game where roleclaims are the norm.
Seriously, with all due respect, it's not like rule changes are a bad thing, but I think we should all just stick with the setup as is. Although it's nice to have a "Roleclaim/No Lunch" (In which we'd all go hungry. ), I think King Kai over there set these rules for a reason, even though they can be changed regardless!
Xyphon said:At the very least everyone should vote to allow no lynch. Anyone who doesn't want the option, idk, that seems scummy to not want an option of no lynch.
No, it's not scummy if you don't vote, but it is scummy if you try to make an argument for having no "no lynch" OTHER than "let's play how the mod intended."
So um, anyone know the vote count?
Then you have Korra Mafia 2.0 where the Cop lives nearly the entire game, providing constant results.Because if you are about to lynch the cop it'd be nice if they could say "Well I am the cop so you probably shouldn't lynch me!!"
It's one thing to softclaim, it's another to roleclaim. Roleclaiming doesn't make you invincible either, and it's essentially the easy way out.Xy said:I believe though, we can soft claim, right? So we should still be able to say "Well I investigated whomever, so.." but roleclaiming just makes it easier.
You're kidding me, right? SCUM LOVE NO-LYNCHES! It's scummy if people want a no-lynch.Xy said:At the very least everyone should vote to allow no lynch. Anyone who doesn't want the option, idk, that seems scummy to not want an option of no lynch.