- Joined
- May 16, 2008
- Location
- Kentucky, USA
What I want to do in this thread is post three time lines which I have came up with judging by the majority of opinions I have seen. We'll call them Time line A, Time line B, and Time line C. Now I know a lot of people have their own time line that is probably different than these, but as I said, these two are what I have seen to be the more accepted of any other time line. Its been a long time since I have done a lot of posting in this section, whether it be arguing my points or posting new time lines, mainly because it has gotten a bit much for me to read and argue with. This site has gained a lot of good theorists over the past few months, ones that even I sometimes have a hard time keeping up with. So I figured I would bring it back to the basics. Lets begin.
To save room on the screen, I have posted links to the time lines instead of actually posting the pictures.
Time Line A
http://i341.photobucket.com/albums/o372/calebm_89/TimelineA.png
...../WW/PH--MC--FS/FSA
OoT
.....\MM--TP--ALttP/LA--OoX--LoZ/AoL
Time Line B
http://i341.photobucket.com/albums/o372/calebm_89/TimelineB-1.png
............/WW/PH
MC--OoT
............\MM--TP--FS/FSA--ALttP/LA--OoX--LoZ/AoL
Time Line C
http://i341.photobucket.com/albums/o372/calebm_89/TimelineC.png
............/WW/PH--FS/FSA--ALttP/LA--OoX--LoZ/AoL
MC--OoT
............\MM--TP
The biggest difference people will notice about Timeline A and B is the placement of the Four Swords Saga, as I will call it. Those are the three games associated with the story of Link and the Four Sword, which include MC, FS, and FSA. I will say that both of these time lines have pretty much equal reason to be as they are. I know a lot of people prefer Time line B based on different facts and such, but just as well I know some that will agree with Time line A, including myself.
Timeline C is quite different from the other two, having most of the games take place either in a new or drained old Hyrule on the Adult Timeline. I can't say much else about this one, because really I don't believe that version and hadn't considered it until it was brought up in this thread. But seeing as how there are some who do believe this type of Timeline, I added it to the list.
Among many reasons and facts, the biggest I can come up with, and the simplest as well, is the fact that the Four Swords Saga is so different from the other games that I believe them to take place in a time where nothing from the other games is important anymore. I understand that the design of FSA, the presence of the Dark World, and Ganon as a main antagonist in this game all are very good reason to have it before ALttP, which is seen in Time line B. These are the most basic reasons that people would believe Timeline B, in fact.
However, a major point of me believing Time line A is the importance of the Master Sword in the games. Time line B shows MC and FS first, before OoT. OoT begins the tale of Ganondorf, as well as the inclusion of the Master Sword into the series. It doesn't make sense to me, that this blade would be so important and vital to Hyrule's defense against evil, for them to completely ignore it by the time the events of FSA are happening. Why would the people Link not go looking for the Master Sword in FSA if it was well established by this time (both by the heroes of OoT and TP), and instead uses the Four Sword. Also, TP was released after the games of the Four Swords Saga were made. The Four Swords Saga clearly shows that the Shrine of the Four Sword is in Hyrule, yet it is no where to be found in TP, which seems awfully suspicious to me.
All of this gives me reason to believe Time line A, where the Four Swords Saga is placed in another Hyrule, which would be the new land discovered by Link and Tetra from WW. It is completely understandable for me to see how the people of this land would not be afraid of Ganon's return (since he is at the bottom of the ocean in old Hyrule), and completely ignore the Master Sword (since it is in Ganondorf's head, at the bottom of the ocean in old Hyrule).
So there it is. Pretty basic facts towards the three generally accepted time lines among Zelda fans. I'll even put up a poll to see who agrees with one or the other, or neither. If you don't agree with either, you don't have to post your entire time line here. Instead, just give a reason as to why one or two games may be placed elsewhere.
To save room on the screen, I have posted links to the time lines instead of actually posting the pictures.
Time Line A
http://i341.photobucket.com/albums/o372/calebm_89/TimelineA.png
...../WW/PH--MC--FS/FSA
OoT
.....\MM--TP--ALttP/LA--OoX--LoZ/AoL
Time Line B
http://i341.photobucket.com/albums/o372/calebm_89/TimelineB-1.png
............/WW/PH
MC--OoT
............\MM--TP--FS/FSA--ALttP/LA--OoX--LoZ/AoL
Time Line C
http://i341.photobucket.com/albums/o372/calebm_89/TimelineC.png
............/WW/PH--FS/FSA--ALttP/LA--OoX--LoZ/AoL
MC--OoT
............\MM--TP
The biggest difference people will notice about Timeline A and B is the placement of the Four Swords Saga, as I will call it. Those are the three games associated with the story of Link and the Four Sword, which include MC, FS, and FSA. I will say that both of these time lines have pretty much equal reason to be as they are. I know a lot of people prefer Time line B based on different facts and such, but just as well I know some that will agree with Time line A, including myself.
Timeline C is quite different from the other two, having most of the games take place either in a new or drained old Hyrule on the Adult Timeline. I can't say much else about this one, because really I don't believe that version and hadn't considered it until it was brought up in this thread. But seeing as how there are some who do believe this type of Timeline, I added it to the list.
Among many reasons and facts, the biggest I can come up with, and the simplest as well, is the fact that the Four Swords Saga is so different from the other games that I believe them to take place in a time where nothing from the other games is important anymore. I understand that the design of FSA, the presence of the Dark World, and Ganon as a main antagonist in this game all are very good reason to have it before ALttP, which is seen in Time line B. These are the most basic reasons that people would believe Timeline B, in fact.
However, a major point of me believing Time line A is the importance of the Master Sword in the games. Time line B shows MC and FS first, before OoT. OoT begins the tale of Ganondorf, as well as the inclusion of the Master Sword into the series. It doesn't make sense to me, that this blade would be so important and vital to Hyrule's defense against evil, for them to completely ignore it by the time the events of FSA are happening. Why would the people Link not go looking for the Master Sword in FSA if it was well established by this time (both by the heroes of OoT and TP), and instead uses the Four Sword. Also, TP was released after the games of the Four Swords Saga were made. The Four Swords Saga clearly shows that the Shrine of the Four Sword is in Hyrule, yet it is no where to be found in TP, which seems awfully suspicious to me.
All of this gives me reason to believe Time line A, where the Four Swords Saga is placed in another Hyrule, which would be the new land discovered by Link and Tetra from WW. It is completely understandable for me to see how the people of this land would not be afraid of Ganon's return (since he is at the bottom of the ocean in old Hyrule), and completely ignore the Master Sword (since it is in Ganondorf's head, at the bottom of the ocean in old Hyrule).
So there it is. Pretty basic facts towards the three generally accepted time lines among Zelda fans. I'll even put up a poll to see who agrees with one or the other, or neither. If you don't agree with either, you don't have to post your entire time line here. Instead, just give a reason as to why one or two games may be placed elsewhere.
Last edited: