This would work just like the Pokémon. And SSB sub forums.
Why do we need it?
In my opinion there will be a lot of Animal Crossing chat in the future as it’s a popular IP and Switch game.
The current practice of cherry picking some Animal Crossing topics and moving them to the Animal Crossing group does not work because:
Very few actually use the groups in relation to our total active member base.
Having Animal Crossing chat more accessible would help the forum attract more members.
Members who actually contribute to the forums with Animal Crossing content and chat will then not have their topics buried away in a group very few people will use.
Animal Crossing is a popular enough IP to warrant its own sub forum.
Also having your topics moved and buried stops us wanting to further contribute to the forums. Why bother when our content is just buried?
We need to make content more accessible, not less accessible (which is what is happening right now)
Also similar topics related to other games are not being buried in this manner. Consistently please?
Why do we need it?
In my opinion there will be a lot of Animal Crossing chat in the future as it’s a popular IP and Switch game.
The current practice of cherry picking some Animal Crossing topics and moving them to the Animal Crossing group does not work because:
Very few actually use the groups in relation to our total active member base.
Having Animal Crossing chat more accessible would help the forum attract more members.
Members who actually contribute to the forums with Animal Crossing content and chat will then not have their topics buried away in a group very few people will use.
Animal Crossing is a popular enough IP to warrant its own sub forum.
Also having your topics moved and buried stops us wanting to further contribute to the forums. Why bother when our content is just buried?
We need to make content more accessible, not less accessible (which is what is happening right now)
Also similar topics related to other games are not being buried in this manner. Consistently please?
Last edited: