- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
I think that a customizable character would probably never happen for LoZ. Links and Zeldas appearances matter in the games. ex. link is left handed.
justac00lguy said:I see no reason as us not being able to play as a female character...However if it were to be a 'female Link' or 'Zelda' I would choose Zelda. From recent discussions about Link being an actual character rather than just a Link I think it's important that Zelda games keep this trend going. Now it wouldn't completely harm Link's character as such but I just think that in order for Link to be this key character in the series they should keep his gender as male.*
Playing as Zelda though? Yes please! Even though we have seen 16 Zelda games in all but one she has made an actual appearance, however over 15 games, do we actually know her? I would probably say no, Zelda mostly plays the damsel in distress role, this most of the times makes her only seen during the start and end of the game. Now even though Skyward Sword ' version of Zelda wasn't my all time favourite I still think the way she was implemented in the actual events of the plot was one of the best uses of her to date.*
How playing as Zelda could actually work, I would lean more towards either a spin off or having her as a controllable option along side Link. In Spirit Tracks we got to play as the spirit of Zelda in certain points in the game so maybe we could actually tackle a couple of Dungeons playing solely as Zelda or using the combination of the two. I think this could have worked towards the end of Ocarina of Time were we saw Zelda and Link team up in a way.
I think that a customizable character would probably never happen for LoZ. Links and Zeldas appearances matter in the games. ex. link is left handed.
I'd like a female Link, i'd like to play as a woman in Zelda like Zelda herself or Impa etc etc, and who knows what we'll get in the future, i'm getting really bored of the whole women in Zelda thing, its quite annoying.
What do you mean?
Does Samus really have a strong character? No. She never says much outside of Other M, and we all know how that went. She has little to no character, for all I know she's has multiple incarnations. I also don't think a new one wouldn't cause much a splash in the fanbase, but I'm not a big Metroid guy. A male Samus wouldn't really be much different than a female Link. The stupidity of these changes would be equal; although you have to see Link more, so it may be more damaging to Zelda.
I think both should remain their respective genders, but Samus is a horrible example for you. They're both silent protagonists. They both have limited character development. Other N aside- Samus's character simply has to stop whatever evil happens to be threatening her. Whether it be Ridley, Dark Samus, or Phazon itself, its all about gameplay. Samus's feminimity is less justified than Link's masculinity. She's but one character, with no reincarnation factor affecting a new reincarnations. Most people, including me, thought from SSB that she was a man for the longest time. Her feminimity was a just an easter egg for the of us who beat the first Metroid in a short time by using cheat codes. . . I mean mad gaming skills. Other M gets so much hate I can hardly call it a canon game. The fact of the matter is that Samus has almost no identity as a character and might actually work if she was killed off and replaced by a man. I'd buy it, there's really no difference. In Metroid the game guide actually called her "he", so gender and character clearly have no significant importance.
I know you want really bad to disprove me. I suggest using a more defined to character like Mario, Peach, or Sonic to bring me down. Bring it on, my friend.