Possibly on the meta part. You guys probably never had to deal with pure meta defenses and stuff. But it remains that I won't use meta to build cases. The most I use it for is to say that something is not alignment indicative.
And this may seem strange, but there are honestly only a few that truly use OC a lot in game solving. I do most of my solving in thread and don't particularly mind using OC or not. If we were bmg from a few years ago then it would be complete OC. But this current bmg and the players here actually do a lot of in thread.
Meta isn't necessary to get a feel for players. I able to get a feel for players without using it. Like MEz I feel like they are the kind of player I just always want to lynch because they feel like the kind that jokes more than necessary or has more just frustrating posts regardless of alignment.
And there is no excuse for the past D1. It was busy and when D1 is busy then it is only slightly less than D2, just like D2 is slightly less than D3, because we gain a lynch and nightkill for each new day phase. That's the only difference. If it was a dead D1, then I would agree, but it wasn't.
Why? And these are the kinds of things from you that disturb me. How is Mez a better candidate than Yiga when both were just no real case. And why doesn't Yiga give us information?
On a random note I keep typing Mex instead of MEz
Yeah that happens at times. That's why we talk things out in mafias.
....Scum would say that. It's how the other players read you and not how you read yourself. You should try to read yourself as another player to get a feel for how much you're doing wrong or right.
Yes. It is the style of Midorikawa.
You didn't say anything until I said something about it and pushed you on it.
Okay this only proves that you guys are the same alignment as your partners not that you're both masons and both town.
I'm assuming Zexy sent out the roles or a decent amount, since he sent me mine and you guys mentioned this. Zexy likes to put roles together. He does the same thing for mafia, so mafia could do so and easily guess masons are the same. He gets lazy with role PMs.
Don't deny it love
@Zexy :p
If they didn't want you to realize if your partner is mafia, then the roles would not be sent together.
Oh look we're on bmg! Prepare for the paranoia of trying to guess my alignment.
)
NOPE! We're as baffled shocked as you. We've seen lovers and neighbors and masons galore but this is strange. LG asking you guys to be more specific is because this is strange.
.............This contradicts itself. We have two different mason claims. So if one flips then will you lynch one? You're clearing them, but also saying a flip would make one side suspicious.
The fact is by clearing them, if one flips, we just go, oh well, and leave the other alone because we decide they're not mafia. It is a possible mafia ploy, a dangerous one, but a good one if they pull it off. And we've seen crazy mafia ploys on BMG.
And I heavily disagree because I've played with the meta king.
What do you think of his supposed soft claim whereever it is.
Actually masons are just same alignment. Neighbors can be different alignments. And we know lovers can as well.
I do like the push on
@Feenie
However I don't think she's a good push today. She mentioned internet issues, so it might be better to push after confirmation of more stable internet.
@Space is generally more inactive than Feenie but on an important note, she is quite possibly having the same issues. So it may be difficult seeing much of anything from them currently.
Who the flip is Finn Balok? I see them on the players list.
Speaking of
@SoaringDylan Can you please update the player list to reflect deaths and subs.
UNVOTE: Funnier6
VOTE: Libk
They may have been someone I don't like. I still don't like link but I'm curious if anyone caught his softclaim.
And please let me know if I use wrong pronouns at anytime.
And funnier is slightly looking better. I also just don't feel he's worth the push currently.
