- Joined
- May 30, 2023
But it's much more fun to just assume things in my favor.if anyone has any questions about the way i approached designing the game i will answer or decline to answer those questions on a case by case basis
But it's much more fun to just assume things in my favor.if anyone has any questions about the way i approached designing the game i will answer or decline to answer those questions on a case by case basis
I assume if woodchucks could really chuck wood, the tree falling in the woods would make a noise. Therefore, the wood chucks had something to do with the farmer being mad! That's my answer to whether or not woodchucks chuck wood,if anyone has any questions about the way i approached designing the game i will answer or decline to answer those questions on a case by case basis
I happened to subconsciously put it aside with KoD(you're cool bro).
cause if you don't, i think it may be better at this point to vote you just to confirm whether you're telling the truth. like what kod said.
How many times do I have to say what I am saying? Hard evidence is a part of mafia. It is not the most important part, but it does have a role. What is wrong with the statement I just made? You keep on saying it is invalid and stuff, but I have already said something to counter what you said, but you havent replied to that and you still say that I dont understand and that I am wrong. I am ready am willing to hear your reply. But you keep on saying that my response is invalid. THEN BLEEPIN' EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT I AM DOING WRONG, BUT FOR SOME REASON YOU WONT OR CANT. JUST TELL ME FOR BLEEPIN' PETES SAKE. Or just show me where you already tried to explain to me because I may have missed it.See, OG?
Someone gets it.
Hard evidence indeed.
A simple "I've a track meet later so I'll reply when I can" would be sufficient. OG, nothin against you going, I hope you got an award (assuming you were one of the nominees)cause he wanted to show he wasn't making it up? he had already mentioned it in that thread before i posted what he was replying to.
You keep going on and on about "Hard Evidence" being a key part of mafia. I third that No. Just, no. While there are cop roles that allows a player to see if a player may or may not be a wolf(guilty), or whatever the specified (cop) role can do. Let's say [EXAMPLE]Ex claimed cop and investigated Minish who turned up green.[/EXAMPLE] That's not evidence of anything. That just says minish has a higher chance of being town with there still being some chance of her being the Godfather.[this also ties in with the example]How many times do I have to say what I am saying? Hard evidence is a part of mafia. It is not the most important part, but it does have a role. What is wrong with the statement I just made? You keep on saying it is invalid and stuff, but I have already said something to counter what you said, but you havent replied to that and you still say that I dont understand and that I am wrong. I am ready am willing to hear your reply. But you keep on saying that my response is invalid. THEN BLEEPIN' EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT I AM DOING WRONG, BUT FOR SOME REASON YOU WONT OR CANT. JUST TELL ME FOR BLEEPIN' PETES SAKE. Or just show me where you already tried to explain to me because I may have missed it.
Given the fact that I am being heavily scrutinized for everything I say (and for a good reason most of the time.) I wanted to show more proof. And yes, I won 2 awards, Coach's award and Perfect Attendance.A simple "I've a track meet later so I'll reply when I can" would be sufficient. OG, nothin against you going, I hope you got an award (assuming you were one of the nominees)
You keep going on and on about "Hard Evidence" being a key part of mafia. I third that No. Just, no. While there are cop roles that allows a player to see if a player may or may not be a wolf(guilty), or whatever the specified (cop) role can do. Let's say [EXAMPLE]Ex claimed cop and investigated Minish who turned up green.[/EXAMPLE] That's not evidence of anything. That just says minish has a higher chance of being town with there still being some chance of her being the Godfather.[this also ties in with the example]
Uum, You've been going on and on against KoD about how "Hard Evidence is a strong part of the game":Um yeah, I do not have a problem with what you said. hard Evidence is not a key part of mafia. I dont believe I have ever said it and I believe that it is. I also made more examples than just the rolecop one because what you said is a factor and has been discussed.
"It's a game of social deduction, it's not about hard evidence, and you know this."
Hmm, Hard evidence is important in Mafia. There is literally a rolecop who finds out someones role. And then you get a message saying what their role is. Hard evidence is used in the game and is very important. And yes, a part of mafia is about hard evidence but it is not what mafia is about.
Borderline Conspiracy theories? I was thinking abstractly and I found something that could of lead to mafia. Were there holes? Yes. But no one will ever have all the information and one as to rely on their gut and reason.
And what theories or theory of mine is a Borderline Conspiracy Theory and explain why it is.
When I was talking about hard evidence, it was when the rolecop gets a report saying "this person person is Mafia or yada yada" You are taking something I said that applies in certain situation (and which I already explained that circumstance) and applyed it to another (un)intentionally and that is the base of your argument.
If you are a town rolecop and you rolecopped Jimmy Jackson and found out if he was Mafia, you have hard evidence and you will all of your future decisions will be changed because you have hard evidence. I dont know what you know, so I am not able to as sure as you are if your hard evidence is true. This is what I was getting at with my post quoting Ex a million times. If I didnt explain this easy enough, then I am sorry. I have no problem with me not explained some thing good enough and so I will explain it a million more times if neccessary.
You then took my example and tried to apply it to another example right here-
How many times do I have to say what I am saying? Hard evidence is a part of mafia
I dont believe I ever said it was a strong part, if I did please show me, if not, then for the record, I have not said that. After KoD gave me a counter argument, it turned out he was trying to apply it to a totally different situation and it didnt work in that situation and so he was trying to say I was wrong. After that it has pretty much been him saying my point is invalid without him explaining why, while I have kept on saying my argument.Uum, You've been going on and on against KoD about how "Hard Evidence is a strong part of the game":
uh is this right shouldn't he come back to lifeOG, Town Aligned Alien Hunter [Lynched Day 2]