Game Thread MS Paint Mafia U-Pick Edition [Day 5]

[Killjoy262]

Ya know it is prolly best to find out this info before you start pointing fingers at people.

You said you had stated that you said something about a disproven theory. Did you mention that this theory was disproven before or after D1 ended?

 

[OGSniper]

*sigh* Okay, I will look for you.

 

[OGSniper]

You said you had stated that you said something about a disproven theory. Did you mention that this theory was disproven before or after D1 ended?

Right after. That would have been for me and everyone to know if you were mafia. lain asked about my theory and I exampled to lain. That was the last time it was mentioned I believe.

 

[Killjoy262]

I wasn't referring to your theory, You were also on me for the miller claim/KoD fiasco.

 

[HangryHangryHippo]

That is all you are presenting? Explain yourself and your actions.

Me and Jamie's conversation was a playful one. Everyone should kinda know by now that I am always playing around and this was no exception.

I do wonder why ExLight, didnt respond to my post about the "meow" thing. Maybe I hit a little close to home for him.

I don't feel like I need to explain any of the things I've done to Ex.

Also I don't feel like I need to explain a vote on someone who pushed against a doc claim and is being extremely squirrely about minor pressure.

 

[OGSniper]

/vote: OG
especially with how hard he was pushing to have me dead.

What? I had a plausible theory with a plausible motive. I can explain it again if you want me too. I have not been pushing for you since and I have said that my theory has been disproven.

Was it durring the night phase or d1? Because I saw where you had a theory durring the night phase

Ya know it is prolly best to find out this info before you start pointing fingers at people.

You said you had stated that you said something about a disproven theory. Did you mention that this theory was disproven before or after D1 ended?

*sigh* Okay, I will look for you.

Right after. That would have been for me and everyone to know if you were mafia. lain asked about my theory and I exampled to lain. That was the last time it was mentioned I believe.

I wasn't referring to your theory, You were also on me for the miller claim/KoD fiasco.

Huh?
What are you talking about here? You literally were talking and asking about my theory for posts upon posts. Why the change?

And for what you are referring to about the "miller claim/KoD fiasco" give proof. Quote posts. Build an argument.

See, I take voting on someone seriously and it is hard to convince people to your cause without evidence and reasonable doubts, suspicions, and theories.

 

[OGSniper]

I don't feel like I need to explain any of the things I've done to Ex.

Also I don't feel like I need to explain a vote on someone who pushed against a doc claim and is being extremely squirrely about minor pressure.

I am kinda confused about your first sentence. To clear up a possible misunderstanding, that Ex sentence at the end of my post isnt directed towards you, it is just me saying stuff to everyone.

LORD HAVE MERCY ON US ALL. I had a plausible theory with a plausible motive (Theres your broken record part, Ex.) with the Killjoy theory. I have explained it a million times. Do I need to explain it again? Hopefully you dont just drop everything you have on someone because they claim doctor. Heck, I even said this

Yeah, I am battling it in me right now. I think I will stick with it. I think this is our best bet so far.

when I heard the Killjoy/Doctor claim. I took it into consideration.



And another thing HHH. Minor pressure? I am 2 votes away from being lynched. That is not minor pressure.

 

[ExLight]

Again, explain. Give examples. Show the world how I am Mafia, Ex. Show them blud.

It's a game of social deduction, it's not about hard evidence, and you know this.

If your pushes are borderline conspiracy theories rather than profiling and analyzing players then you're roleplaying instead of playing properly. In any case this is a game, you'll play towards your goal; and if you're behaving in a manner that seems opportunistic and recklessly aggressive without care for Town then that's enough for me to consider you mafia.

I do not have an investigative report of sorts on you, but I can offer an ISO on you.

So are you a Miller or what? Why shouldnt we keep you alive.

Your first post is literally throwing shade while entertaining the idea of lynching the Miller.
You do not commit to anything, you just throw it and hope it sticks.

Okay, this is a weird post. I find this to be a very happy and giddy post from someone overflowing with excitment (maybe because they like their alignment?) or they are just always like this. I have never played with them before so I dont know.

Yeah just thought I would point that out.

Your second post (and its eventual follow-up) is also just throwing shade by calling Amber's post weird. Not because of the part one could naturally find weird, which is Amber associating herself with Rubik, but because of something completely unrelated: it being "happy".

It says a lot of nothing and is also extremely non committing. The fact it's an extremely random shade that does not try to be aggressive towards them actually makes me believe that if you're mafia then Amber is also potentially scum.

View attachment 75089

Its the thought that counts.

Fluff.

Huh? I was just pointing out what I said in my earlier post that you "quoted" me on. Like I have said before, I am an anti-D1 lyncher.

This contradicts your leading actions. You ended up not only voting, but was also one of the main pushing forces during early-mid D1. If you're "an anti-D1 lyncher" why did you vote and instigate people?

Why am I being brought? What are you exactly saying? I havent voted on anyone.

Overly defensive over a simple misunderstanding.

I am so sorry Rubik, but I just realized that I have been calling you Rubrik for a while. I am so sorry about that.

Fluff.

Looks like Killjoy was going in for a self pres (if that bonus vote is his), but why not do it for Lissi who had 2 votes, so his would have made it 3 plus a bonus vote (Like I said, which could be his.) would make it 4 votes. Why noy not pounce on the opportunity to help seal the deal? It is possible that Killjoy is Mafia and Lissi is Mafia and why vote for another Mafia when you can kill another.

Random accusation of Killjoy being the owner of the secret vote despite having literally no evidence and making a solid point towards the argument of it not being Killjoy's. Seems like a legitimate brainstorm, but comes across as an attempt of figuring out people's role and weaponizing it against them, which is not the towniest mentality.

Huh? Was the Bonus vote yours or not? Answer that will ya. I find it fascinating that you have completely looked the other way and shrugged off what I stated. To me it looks like you tried to quietly put it in the grave. Who said anything about a random vote ability? I am actively pressing you and you dont even try to defend yourself.

Similar here. They notice it isn't Killjoy's and start pressing him to out their role. Nobody is afraid of you and this poor attempt of intimidation is cringe.
They shrugged it off because it's a random accusation that contradicted itself. There's nothing to defend themselves from if the accusation you put forward has little to no thought put into it other than trying to be a bully.

Yup. I feel kinda good about it. Killjoy maybe trying to not be killed first again and didnt want to vote on a possible scum mate. I find it plausible. I am fine for a Lissi or Killjoy lynch.

This is the first decent post. It's a decent logic, at least during the context before Killjoy claimed.
Now we now know it to be extra wrong since Lissi flipped town.

Now we are getting somewhere though was it a wise move to say so? Does anyone else have a doctor role?

Congrats on successfully rolefishing. Of course it wasn't a wise move, but you kept accusing them of random **** and telling them to claim, what else did you expect them to do. Not only that but you still hope someone will counterclaim it, furthering the early role claim bonanza that is characteristic of mafia.

Why did you stay voting on them after they claimed Doctor and were not counterclaimed, considering it's one of the most important roles Town can have in standard setups?

Are you implying that the bonus votes are fromyou?

More role fishing. Why would you ask if they were the owners of the bonus votes if you were thinking they were from Killjoy?

Yeah, I am battling it in me right now. I think I will stick with it. I think this is our best bet so far.

If your theory was that Killjoy and Lissi were scumbuds then I don't see why you stuck with Killjoy instead of voting Lissi which was a much easier target that would help you reach the same outcome on whether or not your theory was right. This reeks as wanting to stay away from the wagon in hopes it made you seem better, but in my opinion it gives the complete opposite impression since it's contradicting how you'd also be interested in lynching Lissi and yet avoided her wagon.

Even more, it's weird how you "sticked with it" because at the second Killjoy claimed to be Doctor and nobody counterclaimed this theory of Killjoy being the owner of the bonus vote. You yourself showed that you were not that certain about it when you tried to rolefish it from Jamie by asking if the secret vote was his.

Okay, I dont even want to get into it because it looks like you are doing this for comedic purposes. Anyway, anyone can see what is wrong with what you said.

I don't. You're randomly labeling people as mafia, I don't see why he can't randomly (or supposedly randomly, since I'm sure that if KoD is town he likely has decent logic behind this read).

I know this type of stuff, believe me. Let me guess, "Oh OG, how do you know for certain?" Avast young lads, direct your eyes to what was said and how it was said. More importantly, the repetition of the word. It is said three times and there is probably three mafia members alive. Next, we go to what word was spoken, "meow". It is code for "Minish, ExLight, and (for someone else, I will touch on this next.), win." Each letter is code for 3 different mafia members and then the win part at the end is hinting that they are overconfident that they will win. So it is kinda like an acronym. Everything makes and fits except for I am having trouble finding a person's name in this mafia game thats name starts with a "O", but we should lynch that player whoever they are once we find out. Agreed?

ah yes because "meow meow meow" is definitely me putting out acronyms of my scumbuds
because I just loooove to play against my wincondition and make stupid crypt messages

I'm not sure if this was supposed to be some type of ****post. Fluff/CWAC.

lain.....youre a genius. It has to be Kod. It has to be. There are no other candidates that follow the criteria. I thank you. lain is confirmed town for this selfless act of courage and valor,......and courage. We are in your debt.

Yes, that is what I was trying to say. Except....why is my name in with the mafia members? That must be an error on your part mate. I would fix that before other people start to get some funny ideas.

OOF, yeah, well, its good thing we got that cleared up.

Fluff/CWAC

No No No No No. This isnt the GKA awards, so please dont vote for me now.

?

Alright we are currently at a 3 mafia to 5 town. What did everybody do last night?

How do you know we're at 3 mafia? We have 10 players and Lain. The usual ratio for mafia is (Total-1)/4.
Considering we have very high odds of having 1 or 2 indetps, this means the setup could be very likely to have only 2 mafias.
If anything this is what feels like a scumslip.

 

[ExLight]

But you put @ everyone? I see a "everyone" and a "Someone". Explain yourself.

Because if I only asked the person who sent me the message replied then everyone would know their role

 

[ExLight]

I targeted Rubic with my Dr ability assuming he'd be the n1 target. Someone threw a role block that blocks a role block, if that makes sense?

Pretty conspicuous turn of events considering yours and Jamie's recent posts.

Hi please tell me which Pokémon I remind you of

 

[Rubik]

I targeted Rubic with my Dr ability assuming he'd be the n1 target. Someone threw a role block that blocks a role block, if that makes sense?
I'm also inclined to
/vote: OG
especially with how hard he was pushing to have me dead.

I don't need to be doctored but I appreciate the consideration.

 

[Killjoy262]

Huh?
What are you talking about here? You literally were talking and asking about my theory for posts upon posts. Why the change?

And for what you are referring to about the "miller claim/KoD fiasco" give proof. Quote posts. Build an argument.

See, I take voting on someone seriously and it is hard to convince people to your cause without evidence and reasonable doubts, suspicions, and theories.

It's a game of social deduction, it's not about hard evidence, and you know this.

If your pushes are borderline conspiracy theories rather than profiling and analyzing players then you're roleplaying instead of playing properly. In any case this is a game, you'll play towards your goal; and if you're behaving in a manner that seems opportunistic and recklessly aggressive without care for Town then that's enough for me to consider you mafia.

I do not have an investigative report of sorts on you, but I can offer an ISO on you.


Your first post is literally throwing shade while entertaining the idea of lynching the Miller.
You do not commit to anything, you just throw it and hope it sticks.



Your second post (and its eventual follow-up) is also just throwing shade by calling Amber's post weird. Not because of the part one could naturally find weird, which is Amber associating herself with Rubik, but because of something completely unrelated: it being "happy".

It says a lot of nothing and is also extremely non committing. The fact it's an extremely random shade that does not try to be aggressive towards them actually makes me believe that if you're mafia then Amber is also potentially scum.



Fluff.


This contradicts your leading actions. You ended up not only voting, but was also one of the main pushing forces during early-mid D1. If you're "an anti-D1 lyncher" why did you vote and instigate people?


Overly defensive over a simple misunderstanding.


Fluff.


Random accusation of Killjoy being the owner of the secret vote despite having literally no evidence and making a solid point towards the argument of it not being Killjoy's. Seems like a legitimate brainstorm, but comes across as an attempt of figuring out people's role and weaponizing it against them, which is not the towniest mentality.


Similar here. They notice it isn't Killjoy's and start pressing him to out their role. Nobody is afraid of you and this poor attempt of intimidation is cringe.
They shrugged it off because it's a random accusation that contradicted itself. There's nothing to defend themselves from if the accusation you put forward has little to no thought put into it other than trying to be a bully.


This is the first decent post. It's a decent logic, at least during the context before Killjoy claimed.
Now we now know it to be extra wrong since Lissi flipped town.


Congrats on successfully rolefishing. Of course it wasn't a wise move, but you kept accusing them of random **** and telling them to claim, what else did you expect them to do. Not only that but you still hope someone will counterclaim it, furthering the early role claim bonanza that is characteristic of mafia.

Why did you stay voting on them after they claimed Doctor and were not counterclaimed, considering it's one of the most important roles Town can have in standard setups?


More role fishing. Why would you ask if they were the owners of the bonus votes if you were thinking they were from Killjoy?


If your theory was that Killjoy and Lissi were scumbuds then I don't see why you stuck with Killjoy instead of voting Lissi which was a much easier target that would help you reach the same outcome on whether or not your theory was right. This reeks as wanting to stay away from the wagon in hopes it made you seem better, but in my opinion it gives the complete opposite impression since it's contradicting how you'd also be interested in lynching Lissi and yet avoided her wagon.

Even more, it's weird how you "sticked with it" because at the second Killjoy claimed to be Doctor and nobody counterclaimed this theory of Killjoy being the owner of the bonus vote. You yourself showed that you were not that certain about it when you tried to rolefish it from Jamie by asking if the secret vote was his.


I don't. You're randomly labeling people as mafia, I don't see why he can't randomly (or supposedly randomly, since I'm sure that if KoD is town he likely has decent logic behind this read).


ah yes because "meow meow meow" is definitely me putting out acronyms of my scumbuds
because I just loooove to play against my wincondition and make stupid crypt messages

I'm not sure if this was supposed to be some type of ****post. Fluff/CWAC.




Fluff/CWAC


?


How do you know we're at 3 mafia? We have 10 players and Lain. The usual ratio for mafia is (Total-1)/4.
Considering we have very high odds of having 1 or 2 indetps, this means the setup could be very likely to have only 2 mafias.
If anything this is what feels like a scumslip.

@OGSniper Even though quoting something destroys the OGQuotes all of this was from D1. you're going off of N1 seems like you're trying to sweep that under the rug.

 

[OGSniper]

Alrighty guys. Give me a minute to quote to everything. Gonna be a good show.

 

[Killjoy262]

Also, who put the counter block on me during the night?

I don't need to be doctored but I appreciate the consideration.

I felt there wasn't really too much for me to go off of, mostly with OG hounding me D1. Yeah, there was Jaimie, but that I feel was more a miscommunication, and KoD, which felt more townie with his approach.

 

[HangryHangryHippo]

Hi please tell me which Pokémon I remind you of

Meowth, obviously.

I am kinda confused about your first sentence. To clear up a possible misunderstanding, that Ex sentence at the end of my post isnt directed towards you, it is just me saying stuff to everyone.

LORD HAVE MERCY ON US ALL. I had a plausible theory with a plausible motive (Theres your broken record part, Ex.) with the Killjoy theory. I have explained it a million times. Do I need to explain it again? Hopefully you dont just drop everything you have on someone because they claim doctor. Heck, I even said this

when I heard the Killjoy/Doctor claim. I took it into consideration.



And another thing HHH. Minor pressure? I am 2 votes away from being lynched. That is not minor pressure.

My first sentence is a slice of bread.

You keep saying plausible. I don't think it means what you think it means. You have to have something before you can drop it.

Yes minor pressure. The post I responded to was your response to my singular vote. Votes you received after don't make your post less squirrelly.