Why?
An info flip taken in a vacuum is not opportunistic, no. But, pushing to flip one of the most active players that has other people voting him without reason in a game with very few active players with your only reason being "info" is opportunistic. At least now you're "disagreeing with my logic", which is a bit better I suppose, but that isn't what you said originally.
Very few of the points I made were ever addressed. Instead, KoD just sat there and argued semantics with me. People have agreed that Number saying they were going to base their reads off how people talk about the setup was sus (no one refuted this point). No one refuted the fact that wolves tend to make posts that look helpful and ask questions without really doing anything as first posts. So, where exactly are these explanations that I should be swayed by? Can you quote them? Because this smells of garbage.
Overstating early reads to push the game out of fluff is a pro-town tactic that I do every game regardless of my alignment. "reachy" or not, it gets the game going, and how people react to those reads helps me form better reads. For example, you seem to be quite bothered by me calling you scum off your first post. Almost salty... kinda like you feel caught for the wrong reasons.
This is not an excuse. The first post is the hardest post for a wolf to make, and where they are at their most vulnerable. I don't see why town!you would expect me to forgive you for it being your first post; why would it being your first post matter if you weren't feeling pressure to enter the agme in a non-suspicious way?
Minish is salty I caught them off their first post. Fairly certain Minish is a wolf here. If y'all decide to kill me today, take this as a legacy read and kill Minish tomorrow.
Vote: Morbid Minish
I never said voting for you was completely for info and you're misrepresenting my position on you completely. I even said before my vote that I disagreed with your logic, so it is what I said originally.
People have refuted that Numbers post was sus. I even mentioned why it was sus, KoD explained how you were reading it wrong, Numbers explained how you were reading it wrong, and I believe there were others who didn't see it as sus. Even DW originally townread him for it until you posted your interpretation of it saying that it was scummy. I'm on mobile right now so it's hard to go back and search for stuff, but you said something like Numbers should have made a certain argument about his post rather than saying it was to generate discussion, because town sees how the post is helpful in a different way or something another. But that's not what Numbers was going. He asked for ideas on plans (good), gave his own idea (good), and stated that how people replied would determine how he read them (also good). Just saying that how people reply will determine how he reads them is a good play, because you don't even have to actually care about their plans, but you can read into just how they reply on the basis of thinking that their response will determine how people see their alignment.
Also you keep talking about how you've generated a ton of discussion, but Numbers post also has as well.
I'm not salty. I'm saying that you were reachy which you disagreed with, but now seem to also be agreeing with. I disagree that it's a protown tactic. Sure it can get reactions, but looking for any little reason to call someone scum is also a scum move.
It being my first post matters because I don't always just jump in with full on alignment reads right off the bat because that's not how I play. I wasn't feeling pressured to enter in a non-suspicious way and tbh my first post should actually reflect that. Lol. If I were, then I would have been less hedgy, and given more concrete content which ironically is what you're calling me out for not doing. Like even if I were scum here I wouldn't be salty because your reasoning didn't make much sense and you've called so many other people scum that of course odds are that one is right so it's not like some big deal. Lol.
