- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
:hmm: Im trying to wrap my head around the aspects of Skyward sword's time travel, did we really need to? dont get me wrong the Time shift stones were awesome. but its the near ending events that have me thinking, to were Link has to go back in time to battle Demise. it to me dosent exactly make sense, If Demise was sealed in the past, then why do we must go from the Present to the Past do defeat the main villein? in OOT i can understand this going from the Past to the future to stop Ganondorth, thwart his plans then return to the past to warn the king. At least this did something to the Zelda universe creating the 3 time lines we all know today. But in skyward sword to me this feels like Nintendo Couldn't figure out how to progress the story and ending, so they Pulled a OOT on us and sead
( ok not a real Quote) This feels Rushed, after all when you do go back in time you cant really go anywhere to explore the past. they could had made it were link had to get 3 ancient items that no longer exist in the present to Progress the story, now that Could work, you have more exploration beat the 3 last Dungeons then return to the present with the 3 items then Gerihim Kidnaps Zelda > U go chase after her > Hoard battle then the Ghirahim battle, No Time travel really needed. Am i the only one that feels this way, or am i missing something? If you was the Head Game designer for the Zelda Franchise how could you make SS work without having to go back in time?" ahh time travel will fix the situation and we will make an excuse on why we had to put it in their. after all OOT is our #1 best zelda game and it has Time travel "
Last edited: