Gummy you're here <3
That's probably her town tell. I don't remember her scum games too well but as town she posts a lot and gathers lots of opinions. She'll probably emulate this as scum but gut says town.
I've only played 2 games seriously so far, in ZD. One in Pirates where I was Town Mason, and one in Skyward Sword where I was Mafia Godfather, as Pendio pointed out. Both games I tried to keep a similar playstyle tbh. I don't know if I succeeded but I tried? Hopefully I can prove myself another way~ I'm trying to slightly change my meta this game though for reasons.
Eduarda made a pretty good point about Johnny but he played the exact same way last game and turned out to be town. It's only Day 1 so most of people's posts are going to be insignificant anyway. I don't think it's anything to worry about for right now but if fluffposting persists past multiple Days then it will be something to point out.
Though I haven't followed the beginning of Viral's game, I do know that Johnny's meta is like this, thus why I didn't vote. But I still felt a need to put it out there, and now I'm glad I did. I think everyone is grasping at straws at this point and even knowing Johnny usually plays like this, I can't help but find his actions scummy (Johnny y u have to play leik this). Fluffposting doesn't help Town, just Mafia.
[...] I'm more suspicious of Jamie and Hero of legend. But that's because they didn't really put as much into their vote. Mido a dressed the issue better than the rest of us on the wagon. So in order from most scummy to least, IMO it's Jamie, Hero, Me, Mido.
I don't remember seeing Jamie expand on his reasoning for the vote so that's why he's top of the lost for me.
To be honest, I really don't get the whole Jamie gave no explanation so he's scum, reasoning. I didn't get it with PatCat and didn't get it with Linkdude. I don't know Jamie too well personally, but from what I observed and what bits I've seen of him playing, his post seems very much like how he usually plays. His playstyle gives off a more direct and blunt vibe to me. The way he worded it doesn't seem like he was jumping on a bandwagon either, but that he came upon the conclusion himself, too.
In both instances I didn't see the need to pursue the information into the next 3ish pages because there hasn't been much to expand upon.
[...]
Again, nothing to continue pursuing on.
[...]
A game this size needs more than 5 votes to lynch. No to mention I did unvote.
You can say that there was no need to pursue anything, but it doesn't change the fact you seem to be joking around and laying low while many others give a clear effort to scum hunt.
Also, to you Eduarda,
@Jamie,
@DekuNut and
@Viral Maze, who are your suspicions?
Posts like this do help your case very much though. Thank you for contributing more to the discussion
As for the question, almost everyone reads very close to neutral to me. Honestly, you're still the highest (though you've brought that down a bit), and next is PatCat. The only reason being, is that he seems very caught up in the whole quick bandwagon, and the only other thing he has commented on is the Mido buddying theory. He seems intent to not stray away from the idea that one of the people on the bandwagon are Mafia, while also trying to seem neutral about it. This could very likely be the case, but since there is not enough evidence to pick point which one, it would be better to keep the wagon in mind and turn your attention to something else, like Vergo suggested. PatCat could be a Mafia member trying to casually point out to the town that one of those three should be lynched.