ironknuckle1
Archer Extraordinaire
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
- Location
- Fishing pond
now this is not my timeline but an idea for one.
........... /WW-PH-ST
MC-OOT
............ \MM-TP-FS-FSA-ALTTP-LA-OOA/OOS-LOZ-AOL
Now it all makes since for the first part until you get to the FS saga. I put it their because i dont beieve in the theory that because their are force gems in FSA and in ST that means they must go together instead if you notice the force gems in both games do completely different thing so i put them on complete opposite sides of the timeline. But the problem is their is no proof for FS to come after TP. And for that fact neither is their proof for MC to go after TP either so i compromised with myself and put it at the beginning.
After that then comes ALTTP which makes since in its position because in the GBA version of it you can find the four sword in the palace of the four sword. Then obviously LA comes next due to it being the sequel to ALTTP.
Now im not going to talk about OOS/OOA just yet.
Now i do know that LOZ and AOL go in their place because ALTTP is the prequel to them meaning that they must come some time after ALTTP's sequel LA. Now some people believe that these two games should go on the adult timeline because the towns were named after the sages who were only sages in the adult timeline. That does make since but before you place it along with all of its prequels (alttp and LA) up on the adult timeline think about this. Hyrule is flooded and there is no proof saying that hyrule ever was unflooded from the events of WW.
Now i am not sure at all on where to place OOS/OOA because they can fit either before LOZ/AOL or after. Oh and they cant fit on the adult timeline due to in windwaker all of the zoras becoming extinct or evolving into rito. Because in AOL you meet and help the zora king meaning the zoras would have to still be alive. But back to the child timeline. Now i do put OOS/OOA after ALTTP because it seems to be the same ganon from FSA to ALTTP to OOS/OOA. But from their like i said it could go either way due to lack of proof. But my reason for putting it in its place is that in OOS/OOA link doesnt know zelda but in LOZ link is fighting to save her from ganon so i would think that he would have to know here to want to save her. But as i said no solid proof.
Now again this isnt my timeline just an idea because i want input so that i can try to figure out my own timeline.
........... /WW-PH-ST
MC-OOT
............ \MM-TP-FS-FSA-ALTTP-LA-OOA/OOS-LOZ-AOL
Now it all makes since for the first part until you get to the FS saga. I put it their because i dont beieve in the theory that because their are force gems in FSA and in ST that means they must go together instead if you notice the force gems in both games do completely different thing so i put them on complete opposite sides of the timeline. But the problem is their is no proof for FS to come after TP. And for that fact neither is their proof for MC to go after TP either so i compromised with myself and put it at the beginning.
After that then comes ALTTP which makes since in its position because in the GBA version of it you can find the four sword in the palace of the four sword. Then obviously LA comes next due to it being the sequel to ALTTP.
Now im not going to talk about OOS/OOA just yet.
Now i do know that LOZ and AOL go in their place because ALTTP is the prequel to them meaning that they must come some time after ALTTP's sequel LA. Now some people believe that these two games should go on the adult timeline because the towns were named after the sages who were only sages in the adult timeline. That does make since but before you place it along with all of its prequels (alttp and LA) up on the adult timeline think about this. Hyrule is flooded and there is no proof saying that hyrule ever was unflooded from the events of WW.
Now i am not sure at all on where to place OOS/OOA because they can fit either before LOZ/AOL or after. Oh and they cant fit on the adult timeline due to in windwaker all of the zoras becoming extinct or evolving into rito. Because in AOL you meet and help the zora king meaning the zoras would have to still be alive. But back to the child timeline. Now i do put OOS/OOA after ALTTP because it seems to be the same ganon from FSA to ALTTP to OOS/OOA. But from their like i said it could go either way due to lack of proof. But my reason for putting it in its place is that in OOS/OOA link doesnt know zelda but in LOZ link is fighting to save her from ganon so i would think that he would have to know here to want to save her. But as i said no solid proof.
Now again this isnt my timeline just an idea because i want input so that i can try to figure out my own timeline.
Last edited: