No. You are most certainly not alone. SS is the only Zelda game I hate. I dislike AoL, but I appreciate what it tried to do for the seriesd. I hate SS. Alot of people already said some of the things I feel, so I'm just going to point out the one that hasn't been said yet, and its something that I always say when talking about SS. This game was supposed to be the prequel to the series, a game we all waited for, and it failed heavily in that attempt. Both WW and TP did a, what I believe, excellent job in keeping the literature of Zelda together. There were holes in their stories to be sure (particularly in WW's), but they were still great. In WW, you knew this was a new world with new concepts to be explored. That's why the graphics were new, there were different races, but they kept telling you of the hero of time who saved the land long ago. In TP, this Hyrule was the same Hyrule from OoT, however it grew up. The graphics were more serious, the same locations looked aged and some parts decreped (can't spell), the familiar enemies and allies were back but with a much more realistic biology. SS does not bring about the feel of that you are in the prequel of Zelda games. You are in a completely new world, the graphics while trying to relate to all games in actuality relate to none, and many important species were simply eliminated which if this was a prequel, you would want to keep certain species. The worst part though is the story. As a prequel, this game should have tried to do something about the history of the game, but not only did it fail to do that, it created a completely new and personal story. SS tried to be a new game and that really urks me because when you make a prequel, especially one that we've been waiting 25 years for, you don't do what SS did.
Like I said, I have my other qualms, but that is my main objection to the game.