Search results for query: *

Of course I don't think that it's "morally right" to vote for yourself. And yes, anyone who makes their own music should like it. If they don't, then I don't understand the point of it... I do believe that I put hard work into my entry, and I want to vote for it, yes. But my opinion isn't part...

Eh, there's always a nagging feeling I could do something better so I don't feel that they're anything great.

How do you do this stuff so fast? It's so fast it's ridiculous. Do you spend like, 8 hours working on it? (Because I usually have to clock in overtime.) I've about redone my song three times now because I don't like the way it sounds.

EDIT: In order for everyone to have an equal chance in this scenario, they would have to vote for each other in a pattern. No one is really voting in this pattern, so what ends up happening is that the voting becomes unfair because it is no longer based on opinion, but changed by a set of rules...

Not that I want to bash what you say here, but if it's not a very serious competition, then I think self-voting should be allowed... Can anyone here give me a logical reason to why this rule was made? If you're eligible for the competition, you should be entitled to benefit from a vote, as any...

At any rate, if you want to know why I feel how I do... It's really easy to take pieces of .midi files and put them in another .midi file. That's why I feel like music should be in some sort of "non-tracker" format.

If what you say is correct about voting for yourself, then the scores are not tied at all. In fact, I would be the loser of this competition. :ezlo:

I was going to check the rules, but the link is broken. When I clicked on it, it took me to an error page. Sorry about that.

You can enter .midi files? Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of the music since the sounds change depending on what .midi player you play it in?