I'd probably fair better in that situation than in my old neighborhood in compton
This would likely be my form of apocalypse too. That would be probably the best of any of the worlds, with Nuclear Fallout being the worst type of apocalypse to occur. And I think it is the most likely too. It only takes one super mutated virus to get out of a biological lab, and kill most of the population. Even if it wasn't induced by warfare, this type of accident is still extremely likely.I feel like in a metaphorical or spiritual sense, we're already living through one. However, I have to say that a zombie apocalypse would not be my preferred sort of disaster to live through.
If I had to pick something, I think I would pick a scenario where I somehow lived through chemical or biological warfare, and then waited until the viruses or chemicals had died/dissipated.
I think it could be fascinating, because all the infrastructure would be left intact, but a lot of people would be dead. Let's assume whatever this is kills maybe 90% of the population, so we go from 6 billion people in the world to 6 million. So the survivors would be wandering around trying to find each other in suddenly very empty/deserted towns, and you would have remnants of governments attempting to maintain order/control in whatever small areas they still had enough personnel to administer.
The reason this scenario would be interesting is because it would leave infrastructure intact, meaning that the remaining people could congregate in certain areas and keep civilization going in various pockets. Things wouldn't get destroyed or used up as quickly as in a zombie apocalypse, the only issue over time would the lack of people to maintain infrastructure that wasn't being used. It would delay many problems... the problems created by automation, the problems of food production, etc. We would have enough capacity to accommodate everyone for quite a while until the population returned to previous levels.
It would also be interesting to see if some areas lost more people than others, and what the impact of that would be... maybe a few small cities would have all their population survive, and some large cities would become ghost towns, so that decades later, that small town is now better known than the previous city, etc.
Do I honestly want something like this to happen? Probably not. But would I find it fascinating or be really curious to see how it plays out? Definitely.