Yeah, what I meant about debate on artful design was in general that influence based on games as an art is an approach to the OP that I didn't consider, but that games could be argued for that reason. It wasn't in response to my own points from earlier.Well I’m not really debating whether or not it was artfully designed as much as I am saying that the objective qualities of the game itself weren’t as influential as the method of distribution. I don’t think that’s subjective at all. It’s similar to pong in that the game itself wasn’t as influential as everything surrounding the game.