Game Thread Little World of Gumball Mafia: Day 4 (Endgame)

[Mikey the Gengar]

Identity discussion is all part of the fun, but please refrain from making or confirming/denying other comments about your own identity, even if it's not serious/an attempt to mislead others.

 

[Player 6]

Identity discussion is all part of the fun, but please refrain from making or confirming/denying other comments about your own identity, even if it's not serious/an attempt to mislead others.

Shoulda put it in the official rules sucka

 

[Player 13]

Hewwo friends OwO
Sorry I'm late (*ﾉωﾉ)
Hoping we can have a good game though (ᵔ.ᵔ)

For starters danganronpa is epic. Chiaki best girl, Nagito best boi.

For seconds, #1 I feel what you're accusing #12 of is actually what you've been saying is positive for this game; baseless gameplay allowing for possible bandwagons and lynches. Which gives way to clues on how players might tend to group or people they are willing to vote for. Why unvote #6 so suddenly? Don't want to be associated with #12? Not seriously accusing, just posing an assumption. Might it not be worthwhile to pressure #6 into divulging more?

Main thing I'm noting is #8 gunning early for role claims and for the game to progress. If I'm taking this super seriously I feel like they're asking for a lot when not even 24hrs have past and not every Gumball has commented. The way he flat out said

Glad to be with you all! Has anybody claimed to be the mafia yet? That would be appreciated, nya~

Makes me feel that we shouldn't take everything they take too seriously. Might just be putting on a role.

That's what I meant! Do you think focusing on discovering people's alignments is a scumtell? This is regardless of Gumball the Deflective's identity, nya~

Do you?

I feel like descriptors may have to do with alignment but it's way too early to draw conclusions on them. The results of the first night phase might give us clues.

Gonna go and re-read. Speed read the first time through so I could at least get some thoughts and hellos out UwU

 

[Player 13]

Ah shucks I posted the un-proof read one from a different tab. Oh well

 

[Player 6]

Sup Ex :fetchd:

 

[Player 2]

I feel like descriptors may have to do with alignment

If this is true, what alignment do you think Slightly Disappointed would be? Would they be a similar alignment to Agitated? I get how descriptors are going to be linked to roles, sure, but how do they point to alignment? I think that's a bit of a stretch.

 

[Player 6]

Unless yo

If this is true, what alignment do you think Slightly Disappointed would be? Would they be a similar alignment to Agitated? I get how descriptors are going to be linked to roles, sure, but how do they point to alignment? I think that's a bit of a stretch.

I want to hear more from you, maybe. Got anything you want to say about other players perhaps?

 

[Player 2]

I want to hear more from you, maybe. Got anything you want to say about other players perhaps?

Currently rereading. They are all named Player and they're all pictures of LG so it's a little hard to grasp who's who. Hoping by the 2nd or 3rd time around I'll have it down.

 

[Player 13]

If this is true, what alignment do you think Slightly Disappointed would be? Would they be a similar alignment to Agitated? I get how descriptors are going to be linked to roles, sure, but how do they point to alignment? I think that's a bit of a stretch.

Might not roles relate/tell possible alignments?

Obviously nothing is clear either way now, so I agree it would be a stretch to make any real arguments about people. But theory crafting what they can mean can be useful.

I think it's important that many people have pointed this out or have been outright against their usefulness, inclined to believe descriptors do at least mean something or people wouldn't be arguing it. Some roles just might not be as inclined to reveal what their descriptor could do. No point in showing your cards now.

Sup Ex :fetchd:

Hello Gumball the Deflective. I am a person, but I do not know if I am this person you describe me as

 

[Player 2]

Might not roles relate/tell possible alignments?

Obviously nothing is clear either way now, so I agree it would be a stretch to make any real arguments about people. But theory crafting what they can mean can be useful.

I think it's important that many people have pointed this out or have been outright against their usefulness, inclined to believe descriptors do at least mean something or people wouldn't be arguing it. Some roles just might not be as inclined to reveal what their descriptor could do. No point in showing your cards now.

I think I get what you're saying now. Descriptors relate to roles, and roles probably relate to alignment, therefore descriptors have some relation to alignment. Is that correct?

 

[Player 13]

I think I get what you're saying now. Descriptors relate to roles, and roles probably relate to alignment, therefore descriptors have some relation to alignment. Is that correct?

Yep. But like I said any actual claims at this point would probably be quite silly and baseless. Like: "Hey guys, what if wolverine is a werewolf!" Just sounds too random.

 

[Player 2]

Yep. But like I said any actual claims at this point would probably be quite silly and baseless. Like: "Hey guys, what if wolverine is a werewolf!" Just sounds too random.

Animaeus = anime = jojo = the most powerful Gumball of all
I can't believe we've found the unlynchable bulletproof babyface father of gods

 

[Player 13]

Animaeus = anime = jojo = the most powerful Gumball of all
I can't believe we've found the unlynchable bulletproof babyface father of gods

How did you know .

Now the real trick is figuring out my stands ability, lest you hope it's not as complicated as King Crimson lol.

 

[Player 2]

Have you read the rules? Or the thread?

I don’t like this post! Doesn’t it seem like Gumball the Deflective wants to take credit for advancing the game? I wouldn’t be surprised, nya~

You two came right out the gates attacking each other. @Player 6 why did you ask Ballin' specifically about whether or not they read the rules?

Asking for a roleclaim is pretty suspicious to me. If they are something like a cop or a doctor, getting them to roleclaim would be asking them to expose themselves to being night killed.

Vote: Gumball the Ballin

@Player 4 why did you vote here? Did you seriously think Ballin' was trying to out a cop or doctor before 24 hours had even passed just by asking them to claim? Or were you just trying to justify a random vote on d1?


As for Ballin' herself (**** it they're all LG they're all she/her), she seems like a force of chaos that I'm not ready to deal with without some kind of mechanical information. I reserve the right to stick her in a null read until the next phase.

 

[Player 11]

Remembering what slot did what will be the death of me.

I think trying to figure out names and their role meaning doesn't matter right now. Using names in general is pointless when we have no clear idea what roles could even be in this game. Deflective may have an obvious role as a redirector or something along those lines or Moe took a more abstract interpretation (like it looks like he did with Gumball the Balling).

One of the few things I recall is 8 inquiring about roles (I think it was 8? Regardless). I don't think there's anything scummy in this action, its pretty NAI. Especially where it seems iffy on whether or not our roles relate to alignment, which for the record, I am inclined to believe they aren't related. Assuming 8 (or whomever asked for roles), had a similar thought process, I don't think its not totally outlandish for town to ask a bit for roles.