Same, and honestly, PS1 graphics look worse than that second picture. If you've ever go back to playing a PS1, or even certain PS2 games after playing modern games for so long, you can clearly see how poorly textured they are in comparison, the second picture doesn't even come close to those type of graphics, in my opinion. I've played both modern and retro games almost half and half of the time. And there's a huge noticeable difference between the two. There's hardly a difference in these two pictures. Not trying to be mean, I know I came across that way. Maybe it's just a sense of nostalgia That causes people to remember the graphics being better back then. I know that was the case for me for a long time. But playing a game on standard definition is kind of cringe-worthy, until you get used to it again. However, most games nowadays uses a trick that was popularized by Insomniac games when creating Spyro. Using less polygons for further away objects and have them gain more as you get closer, allowing for less CPU usage. You got to remember, Nintendo is always lacking in the CPU department. As they don't believe it's necessary for higher graphics to make a good game.
