- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
ok so we all know about the new 3DS coming out, seems good yea, but there's one thing i noticed, there are just way too many remakes coming out for it, now let me make something clear, i have nothing against remakes, they're always welcome, but it's one thing to make a remake of a game for a modern system/handheld, but it's another thing when you have more than three remakes that not only have been announced but they were announced before the 3DS is even released, i mean i just looked at a list of 3DS games and here's what i found
Ocarina of Time
Star Fox 64 (obviously these are games that we all knew were going to be on the 3DS)
Super Mario Land
Super Mario Bros.
don't get me wrong i understand why so that they can show the 3D affects but is it really mandatory to rehash the older games? i mean i loved Ocarina of Time, Start Fox 64, and the others, but it just seems like a way for Nintendo to say (give us your money) cause when it comes down to it, if these games come out with no changes outside from graphics and 3D affects you'll eventually get bored cause you played the same game before just at a lower resolution, thus the "gameplay is more importent than graphics" quote comes to mind, though despite all tis i will admit i like the fact that we now get to play Ocarina of Time and Star Fox 64 on the go now
even the Wii is doing the same thing (i'm not going to talk crap about the virtual console games don't worry, it's understandable that Nintendo is just trying to take us back to when we had NES's and stuff) but i'm getting at the Super Mario Bros. 25th anniversery game coming out, it's basicly Super Mario Bros All-stars on a disk which is stupid in my opinion i mean the games that are on there ar Super Mario Bros. 1, 2, Lost Levels, and 3, those are the same games allstars had on the Super Nintendo, they could have released it on virtual console i don't see what was stopping them, and you want to know what else? in case some of you never knew, there were two versions of Super Mario Allstars on the Super Nintendo, one of them had the four games i just mentioned and the other one had those same games PLUS Super Mario World, and the Wii version apparently isn't going to have Super Mario World which makes this alltogether pointless as if it wasn't pointless enough
Ocarina of Time
Star Fox 64 (obviously these are games that we all knew were going to be on the 3DS)
Super Mario Land
Super Mario Bros.
don't get me wrong i understand why so that they can show the 3D affects but is it really mandatory to rehash the older games? i mean i loved Ocarina of Time, Start Fox 64, and the others, but it just seems like a way for Nintendo to say (give us your money) cause when it comes down to it, if these games come out with no changes outside from graphics and 3D affects you'll eventually get bored cause you played the same game before just at a lower resolution, thus the "gameplay is more importent than graphics" quote comes to mind, though despite all tis i will admit i like the fact that we now get to play Ocarina of Time and Star Fox 64 on the go now
even the Wii is doing the same thing (i'm not going to talk crap about the virtual console games don't worry, it's understandable that Nintendo is just trying to take us back to when we had NES's and stuff) but i'm getting at the Super Mario Bros. 25th anniversery game coming out, it's basicly Super Mario Bros All-stars on a disk which is stupid in my opinion i mean the games that are on there ar Super Mario Bros. 1, 2, Lost Levels, and 3, those are the same games allstars had on the Super Nintendo, they could have released it on virtual console i don't see what was stopping them, and you want to know what else? in case some of you never knew, there were two versions of Super Mario Allstars on the Super Nintendo, one of them had the four games i just mentioned and the other one had those same games PLUS Super Mario World, and the Wii version apparently isn't going to have Super Mario World which makes this alltogether pointless as if it wasn't pointless enough