Well there is the LoZ parts of NintendoLand. There is also Link's Crossbow Training.
A 1st Person Zelda Title..?
- Thread starter R.Somethin
- Start date
WindFishTacos
"Look at those sideburns...that's true grit!"
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2016
No thank you, no FP for me. Zelda wouldn't be the same without you watching link roll, jump, swim, lunge with sword, grab edges and pull himself up. Although maybe this would calm people down about not seeing Link in his iconic green tunic in BOTW 
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2011
I think OoT in early development was mentioned to be a first person game.
However im glad that didnt happen. I suck at first person games and dont get much enjoy enjoyment out of the ones i can do (aside from Metroid Prime).
A first person Zelda wouldnt be a Zelda game to me. Itd be likely one i'd skip wholesale if it ever happened.
Id you want a forst person Zelda (or as near as you can get) justbwalk around in forst person in Wind Waker all the time and see how much the game loses being locked in first person.
However im glad that didnt happen. I suck at first person games and dont get much enjoy enjoyment out of the ones i can do (aside from Metroid Prime).
A first person Zelda wouldnt be a Zelda game to me. Itd be likely one i'd skip wholesale if it ever happened.
Id you want a forst person Zelda (or as near as you can get) justbwalk around in forst person in Wind Waker all the time and see how much the game loses being locked in first person.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2016
I feel like Bethesda has the cornerstone on First-Person adventure games. I would't be that in to it, anyway.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
Not for me personally and I wasn't big on the switch in Metroid either (unpopular opinion, I know!).
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2016
It could be interesting if done well but it probably won't feel like a Zelda game.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2016
I've heard the too, somewhere. I feel like I read there were technical problems that made first person impractical for the hardware at the time. How interesting to imagine if OoT had been first person as intended, that probably would have become the norm for the series, and we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
I mean I don't really get the posts saying it would be terrible. I am quite positive Nintendo would do something cool with it, and make a solid, polished game like they do 95% of the time.
That being said, I don't see the point of it at all, other than the sake of trying something new.
That being said, I don't see the point of it at all, other than the sake of trying something new.
Im the only person who said yea on the forum
I want it cause it'll be different
I want it cause it'll be different
Beauts
Rock and roll will never die
Even if I didn't believe this would potentially ruin a Zelda game, it's never going to happen.
I want there 2 be a new one, "zelda - Dungeoneer"
It wont ruin zelda, cause they could do 1 first person and 6 third person, Itll be great
It wont ruin zelda, cause they could do 1 first person and 6 third person, Itll be great
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2016
I can't stand first person sword fighting. There's just no way to perceive depth on a 2D screen. FPSs work because there are cross hairs you can aim with any anything in front of you is getting shot, regardless of range. Plus there are too many flying enemies in Zelda. You wouldn't be able to see them coming from above and behind like third person.
I was going to note the same thing, OoT was supposed to be FP.
FP games immerse you but not in the way a Zelda game provides an immersive experience. That said, if they made a FP Zelda that was incredible and still just as... Zelda-like? I'd still love it
pyjamas5189
Secretly a cat
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
I read that the main problem would have been not being able to tell the difference between child and adult link. I'm not a big fan of FP but I don't think it would ruin the franchise if done well.