Search results for query: *

i came up with a pretty easy answer to all of this. Link is tricked into pulling the Four Sword, as i said before. When he pulls it in FSA he becomes 4 different Links and the only way to change is back is by capturing Vaati and putting the sword back in the chest. he HAS to use that sword...

Link didnt "take a chance" and pull the four sword. he was tricked, by Vaati, into pulling the four sword, which was holding Vaati captive. obviously, Link would use the sword that held him captive, to defeat him. its the same thing with Ganon. the only sword proven to defeat Ganon was the...

the fact of the matter is that miyamoto said that FS is first. this was before MC which is obviously before FS. i dont know where the quote is but i remember reading it on another website and im not the only who has seen it. there ar emany people in other posts who say theyve seen the quote too...

you do realize that this is the same EXACT thing that happens in EVERY zelda game that involves Ganon but many of those games take place hundreds of years apart so why cant the four swords series games do the same thing? many people put FS infront of ALTTP which means it comes after TP, IMO...

in my explanations of the game i only ever said that many people put FS and MC infront of OoT. i even specifically said that many people put FSA before ALTTP, which would mean that it comes after OoT. this is what myself, and many other people believe. MC is first followed by FS and then OoT...

hence why people come up with their own timelines... you werent on topic at all. all you said was that you dont care about where it goes because you dont include the capcom games as canon. how is that on topic at all? the topic is where does MC go on the timeline. saying you dont care isnt on...

miyamoto has said that on their computers they have a special folder that has all of the details of how every game connects to each other. he has also said he focuses more on making a solid game than making a game that fits a timeline, but he still said there IS a timeline. obviously they care...

the metroid thing was an example...he wasnt trying to get you to discuss metroid... EVERY zelda game is vague. thats why no one knows what the for sure timeline is and im pretty sure i just explained to you why it is included and how it is included. this entire thread is about a capcom game...

thats like saying that if Hershey lets a different company make a candy bar with their candy, its not a hershey bar. Zelda let another company make a zelda game (while still being overlooked by the creator), its still zelda, just with a different label on the sponsor spots.

spoiler heres the quick version. MC: Vaati releases evil onto the world that was once sealed away in a chest and held shut by the power of the picori blade. Vaati destroys the picori blade making it the white sword. Vaati is after the light force and Zelda gets in his way so he turns her...

well FSA has ganon in it and has the trifork of power or the trident of power in it or whatever you want to call it and seeing as how ganon appears in other zelda games and has the trident in another zelda game, we have to include them in the timeline. just because they were made by capcom does...

you mean MC is a prequel?

its cool, and yeah i think that people dead set on it not being first would bring up the tiniest things. im sure it was just "laziness" on the developers. they probably didnt think anyone would go as far as to compare languages. also, thats like saying that the pot designs in WW and MC are...

for starters, i did read your post. i wasnt shooting you down at all if thats what you think. i just gave my ideas for those changes. and as far as the language itself goes, WW and MC were developed roughly around the same times with TP following them, so that could be why the language in...

i dont think that is a solid reason for anything. you are obviously the toon link and the characters in the game are obviously closely resembling the characters from WW and PH, but thats just because thats how they felt like making the game. the language could have been overlooked, or over time...

yeah, miyamoto said that before MC even came out.

i wasnt repeating myself on purpose. i was repeating other ideas i stated in order to introduce new ideas that tied in with the old ones, but yes, that creature looks more like a moblin than it does ganon, also, ganon does look like all of them anyway so who knows if it is him or not, but i...

if myamoto says that FS comes first (before MC came out) then MC would have to be the first game. also, the back story of MC was about Gustav. you dont find that out til later on in the game. this is a HUGE hint that it does not come after any game that we know of. if we have a back story...

it seems that the placement of MC on the timline varies a lot from person to person. there seems to be a huge 50/50 agreement on where it goes. many people say its the first game in the series and many people say that it is not the first game in the series, so my question that i want to be...