Search results for query: *

Eh, the boat is just a picture to me. He had to get back to Hyrule someway or another, and I'd say that was his only option. I will agree that Nintendo is more likely to base continuation off something simple than a very in depth perspective of something because really I don't think they are...

But enough evidence to say that you would believe OoX->LA than ALttP->LA? To me, there isn't enough of it to support that OoX is the prequel. Really I just wanted to know what all the reasons were, or all the evidence, and basically its the creatures. Thats easy though. As I had stated...

Most of the enemies, and pretty much all sprites that could be, which were used for the Oracle titles were because Capcom used recycled Link's Awakening sprites and graphics, not because they wanted it to be a sequel to LA. So that can't really be used as a good resource for placing a game in a...

Honestly I can't think of any ememies right off that are only in OoX and LA. LA's final boss transformed into three different versions of bosses which he faced in ALttP. To me, that means more than a few small enemies, still of which I have yet to find. Anyway, all that is thinking way too...

Sign, my timeline had about the same basic idea that MC took place in the new Hyrule, so on that I can pretty much agree. But where is the "more evidence" that LA is a sequel to OoX than evidence of LA being a sequel to ALttP. Judging by the manual of LA, ALttP was its direct prequel. I can...

I'll admit that in my first posted timeline, (which is my only posted timeline), I included MC after WW as well. As of now, I'm not sure if I would still consider it, but I know it could be a possibility for the simple fact that everything in MC is irrelevant to anything else in the Zelda...