Legit Timeline Theory I Found
- Thread starter RuMbLePaKk
- Start date
Ember Incubus
խոսել
Sorry but, that was so unoganised that I stoped reading a third of the way.........
Linebeck1000
Legendary Captain
"Unorganized" would be the mother of all understatements. I think that picture was meant to be a joke directed at how Zelda theorists over-analyze everything... At least the guy who created that knew what he was talking about. Most (or at least some...) of those facts are true, but I don't agree with his actual timeline. And then, some of those facts are ridiculous... "OoT starts in the year 394", where in the world did he come up with that? Never heard that one before... Like I said, I think it's a joke :/
I
Iron Knuckle
Guest
If spirit tracks comes 10 years after phantom hourglass, why is he a kid in both of them?
Ember Incubus
խոսել
I think we established that this timeline is not legit.
I think that's pretty legit, besides the year and a few other random things. Where'd you get 10 years from? It says "about a century," which is true. That is a very solid and common timeline and he for the most part used decent facts to support it. The one thing I didn't follow was the geography part. I never pay much attention to that.
10 years? That can't be because the only person surviving from the Wind Waker/Phantom Hourglass generation is Niko, and he is a very old man.
Ember Incubus
խոսել
shouldn't it be centuries? Plural? Because Lineback and Jeleane (w/e her name is) seem to be 30 years old in human age. And it turns out that they were kids a hundred years ago. Niko in PH looks like he is 14, in ST he looks like he is 80. So should not it be over a hundred years? because I am geusing a hundred years in Hyrule is roughly 20 years in human years. Then again, that was in Ocean King time.
G
Gold
Guest
Sorry but that was to much of a mess to read.
ironknuckle1
Archer Extraordinaire
since you are the only one who read it it would be awesome if you could write it in a post in a more legible form.