I've been having trouble getting invested in mafia as of late, and the seemingly complex rules of this setup really turned me off from jumping in right away. Think I'm caught up now so I'll get back in the swing of things.
Pips are probably best conserved at this point in the game and used when we each think they'll be most useful. I can see our attack option acting more as a trump card later on when we might theoretically reach a mafia-favoring impasse with a potential lynch.
This is dangerous discourse to have in mafia. No one should be exempt from lynch just because they're a good player; this leads to justification of bad lynches that were made just because the other guy had a better reputation than another.
This is making a mountain out of a molehill, I think. Yes, it's very annoying when anyone asks to be lynched regardless if it's a joke or not. I don't think it's a crime to point that out, because I agree with it. I don't agree that it automatically makes someone a lynch candidate off the bat, but kokirion is reacting the way I expect him to react on day one - he tends to analyze all possibilities, regardless if they're seemingly relevant or not to the current context of the day.
I don't believe he voted for Gumball either, which makes this little more than an observation. As I've already said, I agree with him - begging to be lynched is annoying and does nothing for anyone.
This is a very quick turnaround for you, Eduarda. Voting for an inactive/going with a policy lynch is a fairly safe thing to do this early in the game, and something that I'm still conflicted on. Policy lynches have worked out in the past though, along with inactive lynching just as filler until we get more information on the abilities of the mafia and their general strategy we can start to formulate given their actions during the night. I'm somewhat surprised that you're going right for the kill off the bat.
I'm unfamiliar with the theme, so I thought that Death was the evil school But you guys are right, the set up doesn't make sense then.
@Ver-go-a-go-go do you think attacking players would be a bad idea or should we rather lynch
I personally think we should use attacks to finish off our vig's work if we agree with them. But otherwise it would make more sense to leave most deaths to a uniform decision like lynching (plus it's free )
Pips are probably best conserved at this point in the game and used when we each think they'll be most useful. I can see our attack option acting more as a trump card later on when we might theoretically reach a mafia-favoring impasse with a potential lynch.
I personally think Kokiriok is too good of a player to lose so soon.
This is dangerous discourse to have in mafia. No one should be exempt from lynch just because they're a good player; this leads to justification of bad lynches that were made just because the other guy had a better reputation than another.
So you think Gummy's joke makes her seem town to you, but you say she deserves to be lynched for making said joke? How come? You yourself have made a ton of Gummy dying on day one jokes, and all she seems to be doing is continuing the joke. Every Mafia player on ZD knows the ongoing joke. I don't think she's doing anything new, and I don't think she deserves to be lynched because of this. I've seen you use a flimsy excuse to push for someone's lynch, before, as scum. Though in this case you yourself aren't voting her, the statement still makes me wary.
I've seen how strong Gummy plays so I don't agree with her lynch just yet. But if it comes down to it, and it needs more numbers, like I said, I'll join.
This is making a mountain out of a molehill, I think. Yes, it's very annoying when anyone asks to be lynched regardless if it's a joke or not. I don't think it's a crime to point that out, because I agree with it. I don't agree that it automatically makes someone a lynch candidate off the bat, but kokirion is reacting the way I expect him to react on day one - he tends to analyze all possibilities, regardless if they're seemingly relevant or not to the current context of the day.
I don't believe he voted for Gumball either, which makes this little more than an observation. As I've already said, I agree with him - begging to be lynched is annoying and does nothing for anyone.
Tbh I'm more confident in voting for an inactive. I'd usually want day one lynches to yeild the most info possible but with four pages ill doubt we'll get more info either way.
Out of the three tbh I'd rather vote Bryant. Sorry. Ill keep a vote for now in case I cant come back to this.
Vote: RegalBryant
I am with Deku on his decision. I know it isnt much, but the way Koki gave an obvious excuse to not lynch a helpful player when the whole basis for her lynch was rvs (cleaning his hands), and then saying he's fine with the lynch, therefore giving a go-ahead, I think is a better reason than Bryant. But really, you three need to post. I wont mind vig getting one of them, if they refuse to help.
Unvote: RegalBryant
Vote: Kokirion
Day ends tomorrow, right? I dont think we'll get a better lead than Koki. His lynch would alao give us a bit more info, so I support it.
This is a very quick turnaround for you, Eduarda. Voting for an inactive/going with a policy lynch is a fairly safe thing to do this early in the game, and something that I'm still conflicted on. Policy lynches have worked out in the past though, along with inactive lynching just as filler until we get more information on the abilities of the mafia and their general strategy we can start to formulate given their actions during the night. I'm somewhat surprised that you're going right for the kill off the bat.