My role functions similarly to the Follower role.
I see. In this case it correlates with your suspicions. Look, I really want to believe you, and your role name looks legit, but the ability set you've hinted at leads me to a cautionary skepticism.
Weren't you the first one to raise suspicion on him yesterday?
Why is everyone so opposed to an Eduarda lynch? Because of time constraints? Four people just posted, I don't think getting enough votes is the problem.
Why would pendio lie. If Eduarda was lynched and didn't flip scum, we'd just go after him tomorrow. Also, seeing as how he voted her right off the bat when the day started, his claim checks out.
On the surface, it may; however, some minor details make for some blurred lines on the situation.
Eduarda has been inactive, so if Pendio indeed followed her, there's a chance that no information would have been given to him.
Mafiascum Wiki said:
Based on the intensional definition of the follower role, it seems to work only if the targeted player acted during the night, and if we are to assume Eduarda was still inactive during this time, the role may have not worked to begin with if Pendio is telling the truth. Now I will say that Pendio did not necessarily say that his follower-like abilites were exactly faithful to the general role, so his situation holds some ground. His nameclaim, as I mentioned previously, also appears legit.
All in all, I think Eduarda's moves have been more Mafia-indicative than Pendio's, but the claim business has me even further on edge.
Everyone on the Eddie-wagon knows that's not gonna happen. If you genuinely wanted to lynch her you would've started that wagon a few days ago. right now the only thing it might accomplish is a no lynch. I find anyone who's know voting for Eddie or a no lynch a bit suspicious.
Haha "Eddie." XD