Justac00lguy
BooBoo
So I've been haring a lot of negative perceptions of this game since its release, that combined with positive but I can't help but focus on the hate this game is receiving thus far. I feel this could be a truly great game and I think people need to look past the top down perspective and their disappointment and, instead, focus on the positives.
So the overworld has been confirmed to be the same overworld we saw in A Link to the Past but I think people are taking this quote slightly wrong. It will be the same overworld in regards to regions, locations etc. but I'm sure it won't be "exactly" the same world, things will be mixed up and with the new depth that 3D brings it will allow us, the player, to explore the world in a whole new dimension. This also goes for dungeons, now if the dungeons are the ones we saw in the original then I'm sure they'd appear very different. Look at the gameplay from the first demo, it was familiar for sure but the capabilities of the 3DS and the new concepts introduced, really flipped the dungeon on its head.
All in all, we will see familiar locations and whatnot but the twist provided with the new puzzles, items, concepts, story etc. will bring enough of a twist to make the familiar seem unfamiliar. Now i feel that the game taking place in the same overworld is actually a "good" thing and it's not just the points I raised above - what I'm talking about is continuity. It's nice to see Nintendo bringing this more and more into the series and I feel having familiar aspects returning will just create connections rather than hinder the game. I feel a lot of people are jumping to wild conclusions already - look at Majora's Mask , this game featured the same items, characters, enemies and themes as it's predecessor just "2" years prior. Now MM is considered to be one of the most unique and invidvadal titles within the series, and that's how I feel people should treat this title.
What are your thoughts on these negative perceptions?
So the overworld has been confirmed to be the same overworld we saw in A Link to the Past but I think people are taking this quote slightly wrong. It will be the same overworld in regards to regions, locations etc. but I'm sure it won't be "exactly" the same world, things will be mixed up and with the new depth that 3D brings it will allow us, the player, to explore the world in a whole new dimension. This also goes for dungeons, now if the dungeons are the ones we saw in the original then I'm sure they'd appear very different. Look at the gameplay from the first demo, it was familiar for sure but the capabilities of the 3DS and the new concepts introduced, really flipped the dungeon on its head.
All in all, we will see familiar locations and whatnot but the twist provided with the new puzzles, items, concepts, story etc. will bring enough of a twist to make the familiar seem unfamiliar. Now i feel that the game taking place in the same overworld is actually a "good" thing and it's not just the points I raised above - what I'm talking about is continuity. It's nice to see Nintendo bringing this more and more into the series and I feel having familiar aspects returning will just create connections rather than hinder the game. I feel a lot of people are jumping to wild conclusions already - look at Majora's Mask , this game featured the same items, characters, enemies and themes as it's predecessor just "2" years prior. Now MM is considered to be one of the most unique and invidvadal titles within the series, and that's how I feel people should treat this title.
What are your thoughts on these negative perceptions?
Last edited: