We all have our gripes when it comes to Zelda and its unique way of crafting narratives and plots and overarching links and through lines rather than being concise like most other franchises.
Zelda is a legend, when the series ends it'll still be a collection of legends, stories that kind of but dont really but sometimes could and maybe do link together with some deep or very little thought bringing them together....
Nintendo have the time and resources to change this, but they don't... and one of the reasons i think this is is that they are running with the 'legend' aspect, in my mind Nintendo has no intention of filling in the gaps or answering questions despite games like SS that were marketed as doing so.
How about you guys though; do you think Nintendo are running with the 'legend' aspect rather than turning the franchise or at least part of it into a concise series?
Do you think its a flaw for the series to be so vague and 'legend'-y?
Zelda is a legend, when the series ends it'll still be a collection of legends, stories that kind of but dont really but sometimes could and maybe do link together with some deep or very little thought bringing them together....
Nintendo have the time and resources to change this, but they don't... and one of the reasons i think this is is that they are running with the 'legend' aspect, in my mind Nintendo has no intention of filling in the gaps or answering questions despite games like SS that were marketed as doing so.
How about you guys though; do you think Nintendo are running with the 'legend' aspect rather than turning the franchise or at least part of it into a concise series?
Do you think its a flaw for the series to be so vague and 'legend'-y?