DARK MASTER
The Emperor
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2010
I don't know, Beauts said she was referring to pretentious people; those who act like they're of more value than they actually are. I'm not sure many people think they're inherently better, people try to justify their value by something like appealing to their worth in society, but I think a problem arises when people pretend they are of more value, and use this to make others feel terrible.
I think it is reasonable to say, worth in society based off some ethics generally determines accuracy in the view of most people, which is what I care about because that seems most practical. Not convinced it normally matters what a fringe group thinks is worth. In general, I think most people would reasonably agree Bill Gates is worth more than Charles G. Koch.
Yeah, I understand, this is why I pad my statements especially in these types of conversations with "generally" or "normally" because I think you get to a point where these things might become too difficult to reasonably determine; a point where there are too many in intricate details do we not fully understand.
Anyway, I definitely agree these conversations can get into some extremist territory, but for clarity sake I think in legal practice it makes the most sense to treat everyone fair.
Leaving for ten hours at school, but I'd appreciate your opinion as a Canadian to this post I made: http://zeldadungeon.net/forum/threads/american-2016-elections-thread.53449/page-4#post-994387
If I want an opinions on elections in other countries I'd rather not ask Americans. xD k gottta run
Last edited:
