Wow that's cool! This remake is looking like a much better improvement than OoT 3d was.
I... couldn't disagree more. OoT 3D not only improved the visuals, but kept the same art style, added in a boss gauntlet mode, and included a beefed up version of the very-hard-to-get Master Quest.
Also graphics don't mean much to me, but I do feel like WW was the worst game to attempt to upgrade visually because it was beautiful in the first place.
I can barely notice that the graphics are different (I mean in terms of style as well as quality), and I did see a demo in person so it's not just that I'm judging by screenshots.
I don't see how viewing a demo in-person would be a determining factor in this. Games don't magically change art styles when transitioning from screenshots to live footage.
Just take a look at these comparison screenshots. I don't see how anyone could look at them and not see the drastic difference in textures and shading.
For added measure, here's an image depicting the difference I'm talking about.
It looks great to me. JJ just likes complaining about improvements in a game that he never liked to begin with. He's even said that giving the feel of cel shading isn't good enough. It has to be 2002 graphics to be worth playing of course.