- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
Since the timeline has been officially announce, it has been met with much criticism. Some are downright offended by it, an many choose to discount it as being canon, and therefore has chosen it to still be a worthy topic of debate.
While people still hold unto their own theories of the Zelda timeline, why are people so pent up on debating the timeline? Why is the canon timeline as easily discounted as any fan made theory?
Could the timeline be that impossible to decipher? Did Nintendo expect, or even plan this reaction? I will try to avoid a conspiracy point of view, but what if the Zelda franchise actually survives off making their fans ponder endlessly, and that the timeline presented was purposefully unbelievable and easily discountable?
Considering I don't support conspiracies, I don't believe that Nintendo's methods were that manipulative. However, this phenomenon itself deserves a few theories of its own.
Care to share?
While people still hold unto their own theories of the Zelda timeline, why are people so pent up on debating the timeline? Why is the canon timeline as easily discounted as any fan made theory?
Could the timeline be that impossible to decipher? Did Nintendo expect, or even plan this reaction? I will try to avoid a conspiracy point of view, but what if the Zelda franchise actually survives off making their fans ponder endlessly, and that the timeline presented was purposefully unbelievable and easily discountable?
Considering I don't support conspiracies, I don't believe that Nintendo's methods were that manipulative. However, this phenomenon itself deserves a few theories of its own.
Care to share?