Yeah, okay, if all you're gonna do is grasp at straws from your own backside and derail from your own original argument, there's no reason to continue with this. Congrats on winning at nothing, Cakepan! =D
Says the guy saying that implying something makes it fact. I am not the one derailing this thread. This thread is about Link being homosexual, which imply that he has a sexuality at all. I'm saying he has no sexuality now and he never should. Your the one grasping for any argument you can get even though it's easily being shot down.