Precicly.
The "White sword" seems to simply be a mid level sword.
On this topic: If no-one responds then I'm going to be thinking that I've won...
its not necessarily a mid-level sword. in LoZ, the white sword is the second most powerful sword. that doesnt sound like a mid-level sword to me. in MC, we have no idea how powerful or not powerful it really is because there is no other sword to compare it to except the picori blade which is the same sword only with more power. its kind of like the MS in a way. the master sword isnt truly the master sword til you restore all power to it. the white sword is almost equivalent to the non powered up MS.
by the way, its really arrogant to say you "won" an argument. you could be wrong and you could be right but dont assume that just because no one will respond that youve won. you can think youre right all you want but then someone could come along and completely destroy your ideas like im about to try to.
im really only going to say one thing. the main reason i dont put OoX on the AT is because koume and kotake are alive in the game. they have a big role in that game and if everyone remembers correctly, they were killed by ADULT LINK which means they would NOT be alive on the adult timeline. seeing as how they are alive in OoX, i put that game in the child timeline because that is the only timeline they would still be alive in.
i had this argument before with someone who told me they could have been ressurected but i find that highly unlikely for one reason. the only character that we know of that has ever been ressurected/brought back from what seems to be death is Ganon/dorf. even Vaati wasnt ressurected, he was just sealed away and then unsealed, but the only character to defy death in any game is Ganon/dorf. koume and kotake are pretty insignificant characters except for in that game when they play a slightly larger role. the fact that they are trying to ressurect ganon leads me to believe that they had some previous connection with him. in OoT they are his serrogate mothers so obviously they care about him. it would make sense that later on in time they would try to bring him back but they cant do that if they, themselves, are dead.
i believe it was SoJ who said in another thread that after the creators make a zelda game, they DO pay attention to tiny details that would affect a timeline and they they go back and change things to correspond to a timeline. well this is not just some tiny detail. the fact that the two Gerudo witches are still alive leads me to believe that the creators didnt overlook the fact that in one timeline they are dead.
my theory has always been that you can put OoX last on either timeline, but the fact that koume and kotake are in the game makes me believe it goes last on the childtimeline. youre gonna argue why it cant go after TP (which is what i would put it after) but my rebuttal is that there could be games coming out that take place after TP and before OoX. i would say that OoX takes place a good 300-400 years after TP at least.
everything said about the theory of timelines is just that, theory. unless you make a completely and obviously impossible timeline, just about anything could be right. in the future i would strongly suggest that you dont say youve won if no one responds because then no one will respond just out of pure disrespect for you.
