I probably worded that a little badly. You were's the one talking about QT's, but you were there when others did.
I am Link, the townie vigilante.
You know how to claim. You know that the vig is one of the most vital roles to a town win. You know you can give us details like the color, wincon, formatting, or other things, without the actual role, to help your case.
As it sits now, I don't know if I believe this. Mafia would want to draw out the real
vig, plus it's almost a given in any Zelda Mafia game that Link will be the vig and I know you're smart enough not to give away one of our most important roles on day one.
If I obviously misunderstood it, then you wouldn't have to ask that question. But yes, it was a misunderstanding, and I dropped suspicions on Xinn.
The location of the punctuation was important. I didn't put "?" after misunderstood, I put it after "from the beginning", as in "when exactly did you misunderstand it and when did/have you got it yet?"
The bandwagon would've continued for the rest of today. We're better off having Ark in the clear and persecuting other people.
I saw three votes, and it wasn't very convincing. Right now, actually, I see ark as scummy, but I don't see him or anyone else as overwhelmingly so. He could have saved his role, if that is his role, and given us some less significant detail. Why do you automatically assume that a claim that is completely and easily fake-able would automatically put him "in the clear"?
I saw ark's claim and I think I believe it, besides, he can alwas prove it when night comes.
That's a nice point, but it won't work. If
he is the real vig, all that the mafia would have to do is roleblock him. Then, when his kill doesn't go through, we automatically assume the worst and do the stupidest thing and speed-lynch him. Then again, that's the exact WIFOM argument a scum would make to protect himself after his "kill" doesn't go through, so really, we're almost guaranteed not to get any good information from this tactic on day/night 1.
There's also the possibility that he is
the vig, and the mafia would let it go through if we tell him to target a town, and there's the possibility that he's mafia and the mafia would just NK whoever we tell ark to target simply to protect him.
Really, the best we can do with a vig is not
know who he is, and let him make his own decisions, whether they be good or bad. That way, he's unpredictable and less stoppable, if
he is on our side.
Then again, we should have our own doctor, bodyguard, roleblocker, or something else, and if they don't trust ark they can stop his kill if they don't think it's right, so it still may be a little bit controllable.
</rant on the mechanics of the game>
Anyway, ark, I don't quite believe you, and if it is
a legit claim, you could have done it much better. Why should we believe you? And why have you been acting so detrimental to the town?