Okay, this is something that I never truly understand when it comes to timeline theories and all. From what I've heard (I think it was officially confirmed at one point or another), is that Link's Awakening is a direct sequel to A Link to the Past. Am I wrong? Can somebody clarify if there was some official mention of this, or possible where this rumor came from?
However, in many timeline theories, I see Link's Awakening and A Link to the Past in two separate timelines. (The split timeline). I just don't get it.
This perhaps could lead to what 'facts' are REALLY 'true'. For example, Phantom Hourglass is clearly a direct sequel to Wind Waker. Majora's Mask is clearly a direct sequel to Ocarina of Time. (Child Link if you want to go in more detail). Adventure of Link is a sequel to Legend of Zelda, right?
As I'm no expert as many other timeline theorists are, I feel that there should be a basis of what is REALLY fact and what is just fiction.
However, in many timeline theories, I see Link's Awakening and A Link to the Past in two separate timelines. (The split timeline). I just don't get it.
This perhaps could lead to what 'facts' are REALLY 'true'. For example, Phantom Hourglass is clearly a direct sequel to Wind Waker. Majora's Mask is clearly a direct sequel to Ocarina of Time. (Child Link if you want to go in more detail). Adventure of Link is a sequel to Legend of Zelda, right?
As I'm no expert as many other timeline theorists are, I feel that there should be a basis of what is REALLY fact and what is just fiction.