Link basically started his adventure at the bottom of the barrel, so to speak. In OoT, the land of Hyrule is now the bottom of the land chain. Following the most average timelines, Zelda basically began in OoT on that Hyrule with Zora, Kokiri, and Gorons. But after the flood that the gods caused to protect the Triforce, that land was gone. Taking most of the Gorons with them because as we know Gorons are terrible swimmers with their rock hard bodies. Sure a few gorons show up here and there but most of them were wiped out.
First of all, Wind Waker-Phantom Hourglass-Spirit Tracks is just one timeline (that still has Gorons, by the way). After Ocarina of Time, the
other timeline has Majora's Mask-Twilight Princess, and the Gorons are still around there as well.
Now as we know from the pre-released details of the upcoming game Skyward Sword, Link begins his adventure in a city in the sky.
That game takes place before Ocarina of Time. Whatever happens there will not affect the races of Ocarina of Time. And you phrased it right: He will begin his adventure there. But we already know that he will leave Skyloft and discover the land beneath: Hyrule.
Now I know he jumps down to save the world below but it's obvious Miyamoto is working up and not down.
Could you please elaborate on that? Are you saying that there won't be another Zelda after SWS that takes place on the ground? And that that is a deliberate plan somehow? I doubt that. Nintendo is playing around with the formula every now and then, but they always get back to classic Hyrule. Link's Awakening introduced Koholint, and the next game (OoT) was back in Hyrule. Majora's Mask introduced Termina, Four Swords was back in Hyrule. Wind Waker introduced the great ocean, Minish Cap was back in Hyrule. Phantom Hourglass was in the land of the Ocean King, Spirit Tracks was in a new Hyrule. Besides, SWS
has Hyrule, so I really fail to see your point.
So sooner or later we will have no rocks for Gorons to live in and no water for Zora to swim in.
Legend of Zelda and Adventure of Link, at the far end of the "young Link timeline", have rocks
and water. Zoras appear. Spirit Tracks, at the end of the "adult Link timeline", has rocks
and water. Gorons appear.
They are adding new races such as the Oocca and they can hopefully bring back the Rito but, they are taking out the originals.
First of all, the Gorons weren't even introduced until Zelda 5, so calling them "originals" shows a warped perspective.
And then, who says that there won't be any Gorons in whatever games will be published after Spirit Tracks? Have you read a single official interview that says as much, or is this pure conjecture?
We all know that if not now we eventually will be wishing for those races to come back. I mean surely we don't want our kids to be playing future Zelda games and have them question you about there originally being races they've never heard of.
I don't know, that's already happening. Do
you remember Animal Village? But that doesn't bother me, since the Zelda games keep being re-released again and again and again. If you truly think that there is a huge conspiracy at Nintendo that wants to prevent the next generation of gamers from knowing the races from Ocarina of Time, then why do they rerelease Ocarina of Time for the 3DS? You know what, if they replace the Gorons and Zoras in OoT 3D with other, new races, then you've got a point. But nothing we've read so far hints at that scenario. At all.