It's like taking two different paths to the same destination, sorry about ALttP... that was my bad lol... direct sequels I figured you could figure out as long as you played to game...
You'll find out that when it comes to the Zelda timeline, EVERY detail is argued, lol. Direct sequels are a big deal, and many different people have many different theories about them. So you do need to include the correct notation to show your direct sequels because even though you may find one thing obvious, another person may disagree with it completely.
and yes the CT does eventually merge with the AT it'd be impossible if it didn't.. you can only stay a kid for so long...
It doesn't work like that. No one is saying that Link on the CT didn't grow up, but he surely didn't grow up and do the same things he did as Adult Link in OoT. When Young Link was sent back to his childhood, Ganondorf was stopped from ever entering the SR and taking over Hyrule. That's why he's being executed in TP, because he got caught, as Young Link told Zelda about him. This was quoted from Aonuma himself as well. Everything that Link done after pulling the Master Sword from the pedestal in OoT NEVER takes place on the CT, none of it, not even what you do as Adult Link in OoT, because all of it is prevented. The stuff you do as an adult happen on the AT, and what you do as a kid happens on the CT (aside from the Spirit Temple, obviously), which is why they are named as such. That's why there are separate timelines. If the timelines reconnected like your are thinking about, the timeline would be singular and not split at all. It would go from OoT to MM, to the Adult portion of OoT, then to WW later on, and completely skip TP and all the games of the CT.
the normal split took place after OOT with MM and WW then another split for PH and LA in the AT, then on to TP, then back with LoZ, AoL, ALttP, and OoX, while it went, on the CT, from MM to MC to FS and FSA.. those could have been split or as well, but at this time I haven't decieded on any real order.. again.. this is a break through.. I haven't perfected the timeline, it's more of an outline.. I'll have it perfected soon though..
But you can't have TP on the AT, again, or your timeline is wrong. You have to have the games I mentioned above in those places or your timeline is not correct. Again, the developers have confirmed certain game's positions on the timeline, and OoT, TP, and WW are three of them. See my above post again.
I don't see it as any kind of breakthrough, sorry, but its not like you have any big important evidence here to support this timeline. It is basically ideas that you have, and again, you are ignoring developer quotes with these ideas. This timeline is just very random. But hey, if you can somehow work it out to be a breakthrough, by all means I'd love to see it. I can tell you though, that if you keep TP in its current position, then you are going to be wrong. Also, if you keep LA in its current spot, a lot of people will disagree, as it was supposed to be a sequel to ALttP. But the most important thing is the position of TP.
You mentioned above that you thought the direct sequels would be obvious, which is why you didn't include them. Well, LA is quite obviously a direct sequel to ALttP, and PH is the only sequel to WW, yet you have them in completely different spots.